Laserfiche WebLink
kk „ <br /> f ~ <br /> 10- 4kTc <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C . <br /> The MTBE concentrations in MW5 and MW8 were fairly consistent during the June 3, 2004, <br /> September 13, 2004 and December I3, 2004 groundwater monitoring events. MTBE <br /> concentrations in MW5 and MW8 may be declining but the concentrations are too low to have <br /> any degree of confidence at this time. <br /> In EWI, MTBE concentrations decreased from June 3, 2004 (13,000 ug/L) to December 13, <br /> 2004 (9700 ug/L). Although MTBE concentrations are decreasing with time, fluctuating <br /> conditions are evident. If the trend is actually declining and it is associated with the ongoing <br /> remediation, some mixing may also have occurred around the time of the August 13, 2004 <br /> monitoring event. DO has increased after system start-up in EWI from 0.52 mg/L on June 3, <br /> 2004 to 2.29 mg/L on December 13, 2004. Since DO also increased significantly after system <br /> start-up the results may be due to remediation system operations. <br /> The change in areal extent of MTBE from June 3, 2004 monitoring event to the December 13, <br /> 2004 monitoring event appears similar(Figure 22). <br /> 4.5.3 TPHg <br /> During this monitoring period, the groundwater samples collected from onsite wells, MW1 <br /> through MW3, MW5 and EWI contained detectable concentrations of TPHg. However, TPHg <br /> was not detected in MW4 and MW8. <br /> TPHg concentrations in MW 1, and EW1 appeared to decline or remain fairly consistent. MW3, <br /> MW5 and show overall increases of TPHg when compared with concentrations from September <br /> 13, 2004. The TPHg concentrations decreased significantly in MW2 and MW4. TPHg in MW4 <br /> was reduced to a non-detection level (<50 ug/L)during this monitoring period. <br /> The successive decline of TPHg in MWI from 54,000 ug/L on June 3, 2004 in each of the <br /> monitoring events following (i.e., July 16, 2004, August 13, 2004, September 13, 2004 and <br /> December 13, 2004) was significant. During the 13 December event, TPHg was reported at 670 <br /> ug/L for a removal efficiency of 98.8% after approximately 6 months of operation. <br /> An overall decline may be indicated in TPHg in MW2 from 1,500 ug/L on June 3, 2004 to 880 <br /> ug/L on December 13, 2004). However, this decline apparently followed some mixing during the <br /> July 16, 2004 and August 13, 2004 groundwater monitoring events. If the reduction in <br /> concentration is a result of system operation this reduction equates to a removal efficiency of <br /> 41.3% after approximately 6 months of operation. <br /> The concentration of TPHg increased in MW3 from 2400 ug/L on September 13, 2004 to 2700 <br /> ug/L on December 13, 2004. DO also increased from 0.28 mg/L on June 3, 2004 to 1.25mg/L on <br /> September 13, 2004. <br /> A decline of TPHg in MW4 has accelerated from 4800 ug/L on June 3, 2004 to <50 ug/L on <br /> December 13, 2004. If this reduction was attributed solely to system activities this would equate <br /> to a removal efficiency of 99.0% after approximately 6 months of operation. <br /> s:1268231QM reports12044 4QR.doc 11 <br />