Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br /> ' It is unclear what the system impacts are (for MTBE) in MW2, MW4 and EW-1 at this time. DO <br /> increased significantly after system start-up in MW2 from 1.39 mg/L on June 3, 2004 to 3.81 <br /> ' mg/L on September 13, 2004, MTBE concentrations decreased only slightly from June 3, 2004 <br /> (160 ug/L) to September 13, 2004 (140 ug/L) and it is unclear if the C-SpargeTM system is <br /> actually reducing concentrations currently. If the C-SpargeTM system were starting to reduce <br /> ' concentrations, the groundwater sampling results may indicate an immediate rise in concentration <br /> of MTBE due to mixing followed by a progressive drop in concentration. The agitation of the <br /> groundwater and capillary pores by the fine bubbles strips adsorbed fractions. The mixed <br /> ' concentrations are often a better measure of total mass for treatment than solely the aqueous <br /> fraction. <br /> ' DO may have increased very slightly in MW4 but the September 13, 2004 MTBE concentrations <br /> appear seasonally related or similar to values in September in previous years. DO may have <br /> increased very slightly in EW1 but concentrations are fairly consistent over time. <br /> The change in areal extent of MTBE from June 3, 2004 monitoring event to the September 13, <br /> 2004 monitoring event appears negligible (Figure 22). <br /> ' 4.5.3 TPHg <br /> During this monitoring period, TPHg concentrations in most wells appeared to remain fairly <br /> consistent (i.e., MW3) or showed fluctuating trends (MW2, MW5) when compared with <br /> concentrations prior to system start-up on June 17, 2004. The TPHg concentrations appeared to <br /> decrease significantly in MW I, MW4 and EWL <br /> DO increased significantly after system start-up in MW1 from 0.36 mg/L on June 3, 2004 to 4.72 <br /> ' mg/L on September 13, 2004. DO may have increased very slightly in MW4 and EWL <br /> The successive decline of TPHg in MWI from 54,000 ug/L on June 3, 2004 in each of the <br /> monitoring events following (i.e., July 16, 2004, August 13, 2004 and September 13, 2004) was <br /> significant. During the September 13, 2004 event, TPHg was reported at 820 ug/L for a removal <br /> efficiency of 98.5% after approximately 3'/2 months of operation. <br /> ' The successive decline of TPHg in MW4 may have accelerated from 4800 ug/L on June 3, 2004 <br /> to later monitoring events (i.e., July 16, 2004, August 13, 2004 and September 13, 2004). During <br /> the September 13, 2004 event, TPHg in MW4 was reported at 320 ug/L. If this reduction was <br /> ' attributed solely to system activities this would equate to a removal efficiency of 93.3% after <br /> approximately 3%z months of operation. (Note. It is unclear at this time with the limited data if <br /> this is the case.) <br /> The successive decline of TPHg in EW1 from 85,000 ug/L on June 3, 2004 in each of the <br /> monitoring events following was also significant. During the September 13, 2004 event, TPHg <br /> was reported at 1800 ug/L for a removal efficiency of 97.9% after approximately 3'/z months of <br /> operation. <br /> ' s:1268231QM reports12004 3QR.doc 10 ATC Associates <br /> Inc. <br />