My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005387
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
3440
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545495
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005387
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 6:49:17 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 4:33:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005387
RECORD_ID
PR0545495
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006423
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON MOBIL 2
STREET_NUMBER
3440
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
3440 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Beacon Station No.474 August 26, 1997 <br /> Stockton California Remedial Testing Report <br /> Sstorativity (S) was 0.222. Using an aquifer thickness of 20 feet from the boring log for <br /> pumping well MW-2, results in an estimated value of hydraulic conductivity (K) of <br /> approximately 88 feet per day. <br /> Based upon the above calculations, the hydraulic conductivity (K) values of 29 to 88 feet per <br /> day are somewhat higher than expected, as the aquifer materials encountered beneath the site <br /> have been described as consisting predominantly of clayey silt (ML) with some fine-grained <br /> sand (SP). <br /> Conclusions <br /> Based upon the above field test data and using time-drawdown calculations, an average <br /> value of hydraulic conductivity (K) of 29 feet per day was used to calculate a theoretical <br /> steady state capture zone that would be created by pumping from monitoring well MW-2 at <br /> a rate of 2.0 gpm. The downgradient stagnation point was estimated to be approximately 20 <br /> feet and the maximum width of the capture zone was estimated to be approximately 126 <br /> feet. Graphical representations of the average theoretical capture zone at a pumping rate of <br /> 2.0 gpm is shown in Figure 4, Theoretical Capture Zone at 2.0 gpm. Sustained, continuous <br /> pumping Iikely will result in a larger capture zone, as is suggested by the groundwater levels <br /> collected on May 28, 1997. <br /> • With 27,210 gallons of groundwater being pumped from well MW-2, approximately 6.3 <br /> pounds of TPHg and 1.7 pounds of benzene were removed from the groundwater during the <br /> pumping <br /> The results of the groundwater pumping tests and capture zone calculations reflect the <br /> relatively flat groundwater gradient beneath the site, and the very fine-grained water-bearing <br /> materials present beneath the site. The calculated hydraulic conductivity (K) values may <br /> indicate the presence of sandy stringers (SM or SC) within the predominantly fine-grained <br /> matrix (ML and CL) described in the boring logs. <br /> 1474.11-rpt 4 HORIZON ENVIRONMENTAL INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.