My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1804
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545493
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2020 8:23:22 AM
Creation date
3/11/2020 8:21:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545493
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009460
FACILITY_NAME
Stockton Center - EBMUD
STREET_NUMBER
1804
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14505027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1804 W MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
214
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATE QUALITY CONTROL BOARD - CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A Phone: (916) 255-3000 <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 CALNET: 8-494-3000 <br /> TO: Gordon L. Boggs FROM: Elizabeth A. Thayer <br /> Underground T ogram Manager Associate Engineer <br /> DATE: 10 March 1995 SIGNATURE: - <br /> �— <br /> SUBJECT: AMW7O #4 REVIEW OF IlV SHU BIOREMM1477ON PROPOSAL, EAST BAY MUD, <br /> 1804 WEST MA11V STREET, STOCKWN, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> In Addendum No. I to the Additional Site Assessment and Remedial Options Report; Remedial <br /> Action Plan (RAP), Black and Veatch consultants (BV) propose to conduct in-situ bioremediation <br /> of ground water contamination at the EBMUD site. A Report of Waste Discharge was included in <br /> the RAP because BV has proposed to reinject treated ground water and a permit, Waste Discharge <br /> Requirements, may be necessary. Pat Leary, also of this office, will review the adequacy of the <br /> Report of Waste Discharge and prepare a permit, if necessary. This memo, regarding the slug <br /> tests and the bioremediation proposal, contains questions and requests for clarification which must <br /> be answered by EBMUD. An attached memo contains a summary of the site history, file contents, <br /> and a list of reports missing from our file. <br /> GENERAL STTE CONDITIONS <br /> A. Soil consists of clayey material from the surface to approximately 10 to 12 feet bgs. Below the <br /> clayey layer is a sandy layer that extends to an approximate depth of 20 feet bgs. <br /> B. Depth to ground water has varied between 7 and 14 feet since 1989. <br /> C. Direction of ground water flow over most of the site has most often been to the southwest. <br /> However, the gradient has been to the northeast and east and on occasion an apparent <br /> depression has been measured near MW4, resulting in gradients to the northeast, west, and <br /> southwest throughout the site on the same date. <br /> D. Regional gradient is to the northwest. <br /> E. There is no indication of large volumes of soil contamination, other than that associated with <br /> contaminated ground water. <br /> F. Ground water contamination has been as high as 19,000 ppb TPHg and 1600 ppb benzene in <br /> MW8, 5000 ppb TPHg and 1200 ppb benzene in MW1, and 62 ppb TPHg and 1.7 ppb <br /> benzene in MW9. Contamination in the other six wells has been low to nonexistent. <br /> SLUG TEST <br /> A. The data from the rising and falling head slug tests performed on MWl, MW8, and MW9 were <br /> plotted and, from the graphs, lag time was estimated. <br /> 1. Hydraulic conductivities (K) were calculated using the commonly used Hvorslev method. <br /> - What porosity wto used for tyre sand pwJc, to caktdaw Ia <br /> 2. The average K was calculated using all Ks from the three wells. <br /> 3. Multiplying the average K and the hydraulic gradient (fairly constant based on several <br /> quarters of ground water elevation data), an average aquifer velocity was calculated. <br /> 4. According to reference literature, slug test data may underestimate K, and, therefore, <br /> velocity, by one to two orders of magnitude. Using average values for K and velocity may <br /> compound the error. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.