Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Soil cuttings from the drilling operation and rinsate water from steam cleaning <br /> were transferred to 55-gallon drums for temporary onsite storage prior to disposal <br /> Samples of the investigation-derived waste (IDW) were collected on October 28, <br /> ' 1993, and submitted to the District's laboratory for waste characterization analysis <br /> The IDW will be disposed of at a facility consistent with the results of these analyses <br /> 2.2 Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation <br /> ' During the drilling of the monitoring well borings, groundwater was <br /> encountered at approximately 15 feet bgs at MW-8, and 12 feet bgs in MW-9 Each <br /> monitoring well boring was drilled to a total depth of 26 5 feet bgs The wells were <br /> ' constructed of 4-inch-diameter, Schedule 40 flush-threaded polyvinyl chloride (PVC) <br /> casing with 20 feet of 0 02-inch factory slotted screen The wells were screened from <br /> ' five feet to 25 feet bgs Lapis Lustre sand #3 was used as the filter material around <br /> the well screen A 2-foot bentonite seal was placed on top of the filter pack A 1- <br /> foot cement-bentonite grout was used as the annular seal to the ground surface The <br /> wells contain locking well caps, and are protected by flush-mounted protection boxes <br /> The depth to groundwater was measured in MW-8 and MW-9 as well as in the <br /> seven existing monitoring wells using an oil/water interface probe The depth to <br /> groundwater ranged from 1118 feet bgs to 12 25 feet bgs and are listed on Table 1 <br /> No free product was detected in any of the wells <br /> The two new monitoring wells, MW-8 and MW-9, were developed on <br /> ' September 17, 1993, using a combination of surging and pumping until approximately <br /> 10 well volumes had been removed, and the physical water quality parameters <br /> (conductivity, temperature, pH, and turbidity) had stabilized The parameters were <br /> ' considered to be stabilized when the range of values of three consecutive readings <br /> were within 10 percent Five of the seven existing onsite wells (MW-1, MW-2, MW-3, <br /> MW-4, and MW-6) were purged until three to five casing volumes of water had been <br /> removed and the physical water quality parameters (conductivity, temperature, pH, <br /> ' and turbidity) had stabilized <br /> After each well was developed or purged, one groundwater sample was <br /> collected A duplicate sample was collected from MW-9 and a split sample was <br /> ' collected from MW-8 One water sample from each monitoring well was submitted <br /> to the District's laboratory for chemical analysis The duplicate water sample was <br /> ' also submitted to the District's laboratory The split sample was submitted to Anlab <br /> Analytical Laboratory (Anlab) for quality control <br /> 93822 East Bay Muntctpal Utility Dtstnct <br /> 40429500asn 6 Stockton Svc Ctr -Sue Assessment/Remedial options <br />