My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012582
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
1804
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545493
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012582
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 1:53:49 PM
Creation date
3/11/2020 8:45:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012582
RECORD_ID
PR0545493
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0009460
FACILITY_NAME
Stockton Center - EBMUD
STREET_NUMBER
1804
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
14505027
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1804 W MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ r£ �.• .,. :. Sy.. �". MMM F .-=` ,�.s., .%. y. �.� = - •a#" ;; -- `„'was' r- ''�c -' : <br /> � - _ _ - -.., ...?m�- a. 'a � � � x �PS�-� a�x€ r` �a'c "S.�`,.x� 7 �".m`- -sv -'��r _ ��3�� x ,�^� •_`�' <br /> � �- � � r aa'a�� .;�"r"r?`Sirat{'.-� r„�"�-"� � ,'�,, zg �.�rq.��s �x,�'`� ��-, �����•: ���`� , <br /> z <br /> f�x <br /> y <br /> A <br /> ry <br /> For the purpose of groundwater sample quality control and quality assurance, two <br /> additional groundwater samples were collected and analyzed for BTEX. Sample MW-8 <br /> was a blind duplicate of sample MW-1 and was used to check the red stability of the <br /> analytical results, Sample MW-9 was a water sample collected by pourii 11stilled water <br /> into the sample collection bailer after it had been cleaned by the stand,}i decontamina- <br /> tion techniques. <br /> 2.5 Sits GeOloay <br /> The lithology beneath the site consists of two distinct sedimentary units which were <br /> consistently found at all soil boring and monitoring well locations on the site. The upper <br /> unit consists of clay and silty clay which extends from the surface to a depth of approxi- <br /> mately ten feet below ground surface(BGS). This clay is firm, cohesive, and had no odor <br /> in the borings logged by WESTON, The lower unit consists of fine grained sand and/or <br /> silty sand from a depth of approximately 10 to 25 feet BGS. The sand is uniformly <br /> saturated from ten feet through the total well depths of 21 to 22 feet BGS. In the boring <br /> constructed as part of the installation of MW-7, a sandy clay was also encountered from <br /> 25 to 26 feet BGS. Lithologic logs of the monitoring well borings are presented in the <br /> Field Report in Appendix A. <br /> The subsurface sediment distribution is depicted in cross sections A-A' and B-B', Figures <br /> 3,4 and 5. As seen in these cross sections,the distribution and thickness of the clay and <br /> sand units appears to be relatively uniform across the EBMUD site. <br /> 2.6 Site Hyd[Q92D1= <br /> Groundwater was encountered during borehole drilling at a depth of 10 to 12.feet BGS, <br /> as seen in cross sections A-A' and 8-13'. Thi depth of the groundwater corresponds <br /> generally to the top of the first subsurface sand interval. The thickness of this aquifer <br /> zone is not known although a clay was encountered beginning a125 feet BGS in MW-7 <br /> which suggests a possible aquitard at that depth. The distribution and/or continuity of that <br /> clay is not known at present. <br /> The depth to water was recorded in each of the seven monitoring wells prior to <br /> groundwater sampling. This depth, together with the relative elevations of the well head <br /> measuring points, yields the groundwater elevations in each well. As mentioned <br /> previously, the elevations of the well heads were surveyed with respect to an arbitrary <br /> datum elevation of 900 feet, rather than to sea level. Consequently, the groundwater <br /> elevations are also relative. <br /> The groundwater gradient was calculated using several different three-point solutions <br /> within the seven well monitoring array. The solutions yielded inconsistent results with <br /> gradient magnitudes ranging from 0.0037 ft.1ft.to 0.0065 ft./ft.,and directions ranging from <br /> -- - nearly-due-west to due south. The apparent discrepancy in gradient direction indicates <br /> p <br /> that the groundwater potentiometric surface is not aner. <br /> - 6 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.