Laserfiche WebLink
i+ Oxa <br /> RI 205513 OSR12T S,co Serum Station 5886,Stoclan. CajifQrn18_ _ Agrjl 2 <br /> Based upon data collected during ongoing quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling, dissolved <br /> ` hydrocarbons are delineated both laterally and vertically in the vicinity of the site However, dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons continue to be detected in groundwater samples from beneath the site and are <br /> concentrated in the vicinity of the UST cavity <br /> FIRST QUARTER ACTIVITIES <br /> Based upon previous work completed at the site, and in accordance with the correspondence and <br /> request from the County, Tosco performed the following tasks during the first quarter 2000 <br /> • Tosco received a letter from the County dated February 22, 2000, approving the remediation <br /> recommendations provided in ERI's December 28, 1999, CAP as an interim remedial action The <br /> County letter is provided in Attachment A In the CAP, ERI proposed a groundwater treatment <br /> system consisting of a 4-inch diameter extraction well constructed in the UST cavity The <br /> extraction well will extend to a depth of approximately 12 feet below ground surface Groundwater <br /> (up to 5,000 gallons) will be periodically purged from the UST cavity utilizing a vacuum (VAC) <br /> truck The groundwater will be transported to the Tosca refinery in Rodeo, California for disposal <br /> The groundwater will Initially be purged once per week for a period of four weeks, after which <br /> purging will continue on a monthly schedule (once per month) Quarterly groundwater monitoring <br /> and sampling data will be used to evaluate the success of purging for remediation of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons In groundwater and plume stability <br /> • Gettler-Ryan, Inc (GRI)of Dublin, California performed groundwater monitoring and sampling at <br /> the site on February 28 and 29, 2000 The GRI First Quarter 2000 Groundwater Monitoring and <br /> Sampling Report is provided as Attachment B The results of the first quarter monitoring and <br /> sampling event indicate the following <br /> • Groundwater was measured at approximately 4 1 to 6 9 feet bgs in the groundwater <br /> monitoring wells (an elevation increase of approximately 1 6 to 3 1 feet when compared to <br /> the fourth quarter 1999 groundwater monitoring and sampling event) During February <br /> 2000, groundwater flow direction was towards the southwest at a calculated hydraulic <br /> gradient ranging from approximately 0 005 to 0 01 Historical groundwater flow directions <br /> and gradients are shown on the Groundwater Flow Direction Rose Diagram (Plate 3) <br /> • Total purgeable petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPPHg) and benzene were not <br /> detected at or above laboratory method detection limits in groundwater samples collected <br /> from the groundwater monitoring wells However, detection limits were elevated for <br /> groundwater samples collected from well MW2 <br /> Diesel-range hydrocarbons were not detected at or above laboratory method detection limits <br /> in groundwater samples collected from wells MW1, MW2, MW4S, MW513, MW5S, <br /> MW6S, MW7D, MW7S, MW8D, MW10S, and MW10D Diesel-range hydrocarbons <br /> were detected in the remaining wells at concentrations ranging from 51 ppb to 110 ppb <br /> However, diesel-range hydrocarbons were not detected at or above laboratory method <br /> detection limits in the samples after the silica gel clean-up was performed (with the <br /> exception of wells MW9S, MW91, and MW IOI) Unidentified diesel-range hydrocarbons <br /> 3 <br />