Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> ERI 205505 ROI Tosco Service Station 5886,Stockton,Califorma December 28, 1999 <br /> 1A AS/SVE Test bttrpretation and Removal Rates <br /> ERI estimates an effective radius of influence (ROI) for SVE by evaluating the distance from the <br /> extraction well where the induced vacuum is equal to or greater than 0 5 inch of water A "best-fit" <br /> line applied to plots of maximum induced vacuum versus distance from the extraction well yields the <br /> ' ROI The estimated effective vacuum ROI for SVE at this site Is approximately 30 feet (Graph 1) as <br /> shown on Plate 6 <br /> Using standard operating procedure (SOP) 25 "Hydrocarbon Removal From a Vadose Well" <br /> (Appendix C), ERI estimated that approximately 0 007 pounds of total purgeable petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPPHg) and 0 061 pounds of MTBE were removed during the AS/SVE test <br /> Results of laboratory analyses and cumulative pounds of TPPHg and MTBE removed are shown In <br /> Table 2 MTBE concentrations and removal rates are presented on Graph 2 Based on readings <br /> collected from MW3 on May 12, 1999, the projected initial SVE removal rates are <0 03 pounds per <br /> day of TPPHg, and 0 06 pounds per day of MTBE <br /> 332 Summar Conclu ion <br /> Based on the data collected In the field during the test periods and analytical laboratory results <br /> • Approximately 0 007 pounds of TPPHg and 0 061 pounds of MTBE were removed by SVE <br /> • The estimated effective vacuum ROI for SVE is approximately 30 feet <br /> AP Y <br /> ' • The projected initial removal rates for SVE are <0 03 pounds per day TPPHg, and <br /> ' 0 06 pounds per day MTBE <br /> • Based on data collected during the feasibility testing, SVE with AS appears to be technically <br /> feasible However, based upon soil vapor concentrations, removal rates, and operational costs, <br /> ' It is not economical to implement AS/SVE as a soil remediation system at this site <br /> 6 <br />