Laserfiche WebLink
THIRD QUARTER 1996 ' <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT • <br /> USA STATION#110-STOCKTON ' <br /> AUGUST, 1996 <br /> 2.2 Monitoring Well Purging <br /> The monitonng wells were purged using a 2-inch diameter, submersible Rediflo groundwater <br /> pump, until a minimum of three equivalent well volumes of water were removed from each well ' <br /> Groundwater purged from the wells was placed into Department of Transportation(DOT) <br /> approved 55-gallon drums and stored on-site prior to disposal by USA To reduce the potential <br /> for cross contamination between wells, all purging and samphng equipment was washed in a ' <br /> trisodium phosphate solution and rinsed in potable water prior to each usage During the <br /> groundwater purging operations, physical parameters such as pH, temperature and conductivity <br /> were monitored and recorded on field data sheets, which are included in Appendix A ' <br /> Groundwater purging was discontinued when the physical parameters appeared to stabilize in the <br /> purged groundwater <br /> 2.3 Groundwater Sampling <br /> Prior to sampling, the wells were allowed to recharge to 80 percent of their initial static water ' <br /> levels (SWLs) Groundwater samples were collected from MW-1-P through MW-6-P using a <br /> new disposable bailer Samples were placed into the appropriate laboratory prepared containers, <br /> using proper sample handling and chain-of-custody(COC)protocol established under applicable <br /> SW-846 procedures issued by the USEPA The samples were labeled with the date, time and <br /> identifying well number, then stored in a cooler at 4° Centigrade or less, and transported to a <br /> state certified laboratory under completed COC documentation ' <br /> 2.4 Groundwater Analyses <br /> I 1 <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH G and D, BTEX, MTBE and total lead using EPA <br /> Methods 8015K 8020 and 239 2, respectively The analyses were conducted by Sierra ' <br /> Laboratories, Inc (Sierra) a California State certified laboratory in accordance with state <br /> guidelines and EPA protocol <br /> 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following sections discuss findings from the groundwater gauging and sampling activities <br /> conducted on July 19, 1996 <br /> 3.1 Groundwater Flow and Gradient <br /> Groundwater data collected at the site indicates that depths to groundwater range from 67 31 to ' <br /> 68 23-feet below ground surface(bgs) The groundwater elevations range from 42 62 to 4187- <br /> feet below mean sea level (MSL) <br /> 2 <br />