Laserfiche WebLink
' 5.2 Lithology <br /> Subsurface conditions interpreted at the site are based on the findings of the scope of services <br /> performed by Park on September 1, 21 3 and 29, 1992 and a review of earlier site assessment <br /> reports Specific soils encountered from the ground surface to the total depths drilled varied <br /> ' from boring to boring even though the site is flat The site is generally underlain with moist <br /> hard silt mixtures with several lenses of fine grain sand Some of the mixtures noted were <br /> clayey silt, fine sandy silt and clayey fine sandy silt Strong brown, reddish brown and grayish <br /> brown, were the dominant colors of the soils encountered in each of the borings. Detailed <br /> descriptions of soils encountered in each of the four soil borings are included on the soil bonng <br /> logs included in Appendix B Soils were described using the USCS classification which is <br /> presented in Appendix B <br /> i <br /> 5.3 Groundwater Conditions <br /> Historically, groundwater has been reported as shallow as 46 5 feet bgs (Pacific Environmental <br /> Group, Inc report dated March 16, 1987) Wet soils were encountered in three of the four soil <br /> borings drilled by Park at a depth of approximately 75 feet bgs Static ground water levels in <br /> MW-1-P, MW-2-P and MW-3-P were measured on September 29, 1992, October 9+, 1992 and <br /> October 23, 1992 and were noted between 75 11 feet and 76 79 feet bgs Depth to groundwater <br /> ' measurements on September 29, 1992, were collected prior to well development procedures <br /> Groundwater flow direction calculations from data collected on that day indicated that <br /> groundwater flow is to the south southeast (Figure 3 of Appendix A) On the two subsequent <br /> dates, depth to groundwater measurements indicated that groundwater was flowing to the <br /> northeast <br /> ' Previous reports reviewed by Park indicated the regional and local groundwater flow direction <br /> is to the northwest Based on Park's groundwater measurements it appears that a local anomaly <br /> may be present and the groundwater is flowing to the northeast with a hydraulic gradient of <br /> approximately 0 003 or 0 3 feet per 100 feet Figures 4 and 5 in Appendix A present a graphic <br /> illustration of the data obtained from October 9 and 23, 1992 groundwater measuring dates <br /> ' During the period of study (March, 1987 to October, 1992) groundwater has declined <br /> approximately 30 feet No free product was found during this investigation <br /> I <br /> 5.4 Results of Soil Sample Analyses <br /> Laboratory soil test results are summarized in Table IV Laboratory reports and chain of <br /> rcustody documents, including a list of all soil samples collected are provided in Appendix D <br /> B 112511 RPT 11 <br /> I <br />