My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005288
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARIPOSA
>
2132
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0541650
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2020 4:33:22 PM
Creation date
3/11/2020 2:57:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005288
RECORD_ID
PR0541650
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0023868
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER USA GASOLINE SERVICE STATION 110
STREET_NUMBER
2132
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MARIPOSA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
1730635
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2132 E MARIPOSA RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SECOND QUARTER,2000 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> USA STATION#110 -STOCKTON <br />' JULY,2000 <br /> 2.2 Monitoring Well Purging <br /> rThe monitoring wells were purged using a 2-inch diameter, submersible Rediflo groundwater <br /> pump or disposable bailer, until a minimum of three equivalent well volumes of water were <br /> removed from each well Groundwater purged from the wells was placed into Department of <br /> Transportation approved 55-gallon drums and stored on-site prior to disposal by USA <br />' To reduce the potential for cross contamination between the wells, all purging and sampling <br /> equipment was washed in a trisodium phosphate solution and rinsed in potable water, prior to <br /> each usage During the groundwater purging operations,physical parameters such as pH, <br /> temperature and conductivity were monitored and recorded on field data sheets, which are <br /> included in Appendix A Groundwater purging was discontinued when the physical parameters <br /> appeared to stabilize in the purged groundwater <br /> 2.3 Groundwater Sampling <br /> p g <br /> Prior to sampling, the wells were allowed to recharge to a mwnmum of 80% of their initial static <br /> water levels Groundwater samples were collected from MW-1-P through MW-6-P, MW-1 and <br /> MW-2 using new disposable bailers The samples were placed into the appropriate laboratory <br /> prepared containers, using proper sample handling and chain.-of-custody(COC) protocol issued <br /> by the USEPA. The samples were labeled with the date, time, identifying well number,then <br />' stored in a cooler at 4° Centigrade or less, and transported to a California State certified <br /> laboratory under completed COC documentation <br /> 2.4 Groundwater Analyses <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH G, BTEX, 1,2-DCA, and oxygenated fuel additives <br /> including MTBE,DIPE, TAME, ETBE, TBA, and ethanol using EPA Methods 8015M, 8020 and <br /> 8260B, respectively The analyses were conducted by Sierra Laboratories (Sierra), a California <br /> State certified laboratory, in accordance with state guidelines and EPA protocol <br /> 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following sections discuss findings from the groundwater gauging and sampling activities <br /> conducted on April 6, 2000 <br />' 3.1 Groundwater Flow and Gradient <br /> 1 Groundwater data collected at the site indicates that depths to groundwater ranged from 55 15- <br /> feet below ground surface (bgs) in MW-1 to 56 23-feet bgs in MW-6P The groundwater <br /> elevations ranged from 29 54-feet below mean sea level(MSL) in MW-1 to 30 62-feet MSL in <br />' MW-6P <br />' 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.