Laserfiche WebLink
SECOND QUARTER,2000 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> USA STATION#110 -STOCKTON <br />' JULY,2000 <br /> 2.2 Monitoring Well Purging <br /> rThe monitoring wells were purged using a 2-inch diameter, submersible Rediflo groundwater <br /> pump or disposable bailer, until a minimum of three equivalent well volumes of water were <br /> removed from each well Groundwater purged from the wells was placed into Department of <br /> Transportation approved 55-gallon drums and stored on-site prior to disposal by USA <br />' To reduce the potential for cross contamination between the wells, all purging and sampling <br /> equipment was washed in a trisodium phosphate solution and rinsed in potable water, prior to <br /> each usage During the groundwater purging operations,physical parameters such as pH, <br /> temperature and conductivity were monitored and recorded on field data sheets, which are <br /> included in Appendix A Groundwater purging was discontinued when the physical parameters <br /> appeared to stabilize in the purged groundwater <br /> 2.3 Groundwater Sampling <br /> p g <br /> Prior to sampling, the wells were allowed to recharge to a mwnmum of 80% of their initial static <br /> water levels Groundwater samples were collected from MW-1-P through MW-6-P, MW-1 and <br /> MW-2 using new disposable bailers The samples were placed into the appropriate laboratory <br /> prepared containers, using proper sample handling and chain.-of-custody(COC) protocol issued <br /> by the USEPA. The samples were labeled with the date, time, identifying well number,then <br />' stored in a cooler at 4° Centigrade or less, and transported to a California State certified <br /> laboratory under completed COC documentation <br /> 2.4 Groundwater Analyses <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH G, BTEX, 1,2-DCA, and oxygenated fuel additives <br /> including MTBE,DIPE, TAME, ETBE, TBA, and ethanol using EPA Methods 8015M, 8020 and <br /> 8260B, respectively The analyses were conducted by Sierra Laboratories (Sierra), a California <br /> State certified laboratory, in accordance with state guidelines and EPA protocol <br /> 3.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following sections discuss findings from the groundwater gauging and sampling activities <br /> conducted on April 6, 2000 <br />' 3.1 Groundwater Flow and Gradient <br /> 1 Groundwater data collected at the site indicates that depths to groundwater ranged from 55 15- <br /> feet below ground surface (bgs) in MW-1 to 56 23-feet bgs in MW-6P The groundwater <br /> elevations ranged from 29 54-feet below mean sea level(MSL) in MW-1 to 30 62-feet MSL in <br />' MW-6P <br />' 2 <br />