Laserfiche WebLink
C A <br /> VV2 V( <br /> A S S O C F A T E S I N C <br /> concentrations up to 4 2 and 6 4 mg/kg in the soil samples collected beneath the USTs and <br /> dispensers, respectively Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was detected at concentrations up to 28 <br /> and 18 mg/kg in the soil samples collected beneath the USTs and dispensers, respectively <br /> Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil excavated during UST and associated pipeline removal were <br /> disposed of off-site at a licensed landfill GHH Engineering estimated the mass of residual gasoline <br /> at the site to be approximately 163 gallons based on Information in a Request for No Further Action <br /> report dated February 2000 <br /> GHH Engineering performed quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling from July 1997 to <br /> September 2002 The historical groundwater gradient direction has ranged from northeast to the <br /> southeast <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> Water levels were measured in wells MW-1P through MW-6P, MW-1, and MW-2 on February 8, <br /> 2005 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figure 2 Depth to water levels ranged <br /> from 63 51 to 64 59 feet below the tops of the well casings The groundwater elevation increased an <br /> average of 145 feet since the previous quarter The water level data were used to develop the <br /> groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) The average hydraulic gradient on February 8, 2005, <br /> was calculated to be 0 002 ft/ft or approximately 10 6 ft/mile, and generally flowed towards the <br /> south, southeast A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On February 8, 2005, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1P <br /> through MW-6P, MW-1, and MW-2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water <br /> was measured in the wells and the pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured in the <br /> groundwater purged from the monitoring wells and recorded Aquifer parameters were allowed to <br /> stabilize and a minimum of three well casing volumes were purged from each well prior to sampling <br /> The wells were allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well using dedicated <br /> disposable bailers Purged well water was contained on site in DOT approved 55-gallon drums for <br /> disposal pending receipt of laboratory results <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to Argon Laboratories, a state- <br /> certified analytical laboratory (Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program Certificate No <br /> 2359) located in Ceres, California, for analyses Laboratory analyses consisted of TPHg utilizing <br /> EPA Method 8015M, BTEX utilizing EPA Method 8021B, and oxygenate fuel additives MTBE, <br /> ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), tertiary <br /> amyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) utilizing EPA <br /> Method 8260B Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment 1 <br /> ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> TPHg was detected in samples collected from wells MW-1P, MW-2P, MW-3P, MW-1, and MW-2 at <br /> concentrations of 66 micrograms per liter (µg11), 250 µg11, 120 µg/l, 500 gg/l, and 130 µg/l, <br /> s\environmental12591210003-Stockton\Quanly\IQR-2005 doe 2 <br />