Laserfiche WebLink
i I <br /> In 1997, GHH Engineering removed three 12,000-gallon gasoline underground storage tanks <br /> (USTs), one 3,000-gallon diesel UST, and fuel pipelines The highest total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) concentration detected was 5,000 milligrams per kilogram <br /> (mg/kg) in the soil sample collected beneath the diesel fuel dispenser The highest TPHg <br /> concentration detected was 4,800 mg/kg in the soil sample collected beneath the gasoline USTs <br /> Benzene was detected at concentrations up to 4 2 and 6 4 mg/kg in the soil samples collected <br /> beneath the USTs and dispensers, respectively Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was detected <br /> at concentrations up to 28 and 18 mg/kg in the soil samples collected beneath the USTs and <br /> dispensers, respectively Approximately 400 cubic yards of soil excavated during UST and <br /> associated pipeline removal was disposed of off-site at a licensed landfill GHH Engineering <br /> estimated the mass of residual gasoline at the site to be approximately 163 gallons per a Request <br /> for No Further Action report dated February 2000 <br /> GHH Engineering performed quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling from July 1997 to <br /> September 2002 The historic groundwater gradient direction has ranged from northeast to the <br /> southeast <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> • Water level measurements were collected from wells MW-1P through MW-6P, MW-1 and MW-2 <br /> on May 18, 2004 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown on Figures 2 and 3 Depth to <br /> water levels ranged from 62 67 to 63 78 feet below the tops of the well casings The <br /> groundwater elevation increased an average of 0 04 feet since the previous quarter The water <br /> level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 3) The average <br /> hydraulic gradient on May 18, 2004 was calculated to be 0 009 ft/ft or approximately 48 ft/mile, <br /> and flowed generally towards the northwest A summary of groundwater monitoring data is <br /> presented in Table 1 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On May 18, 2004, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW-1P <br /> through MW-6P, MW-1, and MW-2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to <br /> water, pH, electrical conductivity, and temperature were measured in the groundwater purged <br /> from the monitoring wells and recorded Aquifer parameters were allowed to stabilize and a <br /> minimum of three well casing volumes were purged from each well prior to sampling The wells <br /> were allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well using dedicated disposable <br /> bailers Purged well water was contained on site in DOT approved 55-gallon drums and labeled <br /> for disposal pending receipt of laboratory results <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to Argon Laboratories, a <br /> state-certified analytical laboratory (FLAP cert no 2359) located in Ceres, California, for <br /> . analyses Laboratory analyses consisted of TPHg utilizing EPA Method 8015B, BTEX utilizing <br /> EPA Method 8021B, and oxygenate fuel additives MTBE, ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), di- <br /> slenvironmenta11259i210003 StocktonlQuanly12QR-2004doc 2 <br /> I <br />