Laserfiche WebLink
VV D <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> In 1997 GHH Engineering removed fuel pipelines, three 12,000-gallon gasoline underground <br /> storage tanks (USTs), and one 3,000-gallon diesel UST The highest total petroleum <br /> hydrocarbons as diesel (TPHd) concentration was detected at 5,000 mg/kg in the soil sample <br /> collected beneath the diesel fuel dispenser The highest TPHg concentration was detected at <br /> 4,800 mg/kg in the soil sample collected beneath the gasoline USTs Benzene was detected at up <br /> to 4 2 and 6 4 mg/kg in the soil samples collected beneath the USTs and dispensers, respectively <br /> Methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) was detected at up to 28 and 18 mg/kg in the soil samples <br /> collected beneath the USTs and dispensers, respectively Approximately 400 yards of soil <br /> excavated during UST and associated pipeline removal was disposed of offsite at a licensed <br /> landfill GHH Engineering estimated the mass of residual gasoline at the site to be <br /> approximately 1065 <br /> GHH Engineering performed quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling from July 1997 to <br /> September 2002 The historic groundwater gradient direction has ranged from northeast to the <br /> southeast <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW-1P through MW-6P, MW-1, and MW- <br /> . 2 on November 14, 2002 Depth to water levels ranged from 62 57 to 63 61 feet below the tops <br /> of the well casings The water level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour <br /> map (Figure 3) The average hydraulic gradient on November 14, 2002 was calculated to be <br /> 0 002 ft/ft or approximately 9 3 Wmile towards the southeast A summary of groundwater <br /> monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On November 14, 2002, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells <br /> MW-1P through MW-6P, MW-1, and MW-2 The locations of the monitoring wells are shown <br /> on Figures 2 and 3 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical <br /> conductivity, and temperature were measured in the monitoring wells and recorded Aquifer <br /> parameters were allowed to stablilize and a minimum of three well casing volumes were purged <br /> from each well prior to sampling The wells were allowed to recover and samples were collected <br /> from each well using dedicated disposable bailers Purged well water was contained on site in <br /> DOT approved 55-gallon drums and labeled for disposal pending receipt of laboratory results <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to Argon Laboratories, a <br /> state-certified analytical laboratory (ELAP cert no 2359) located in Ceres, California, for <br /> analysis Laboratory analysis consisted of total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) <br /> utilizing EPA method 8015, benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, total xylenes (BTEX) utilizing <br /> EPA Method 8020, and oxygenate fuel additives MTBE, ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE), di- <br /> isopropyl ether (DIPE), tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), tertiary amyl ether (TAME), 1,2- <br /> w lwordpro12591210003-Stockton\Quartlyl4QR-2002 doc 2 <br />