Laserfiche WebLink
AGS 87031-•2 <br /> rcontamination- <br /> No. 110 <br /> alifornia <br /> ere first sampled for subjective evidence of <br /> on. The bailer was lowered half-way <br /> through the <br /> r surface to obtain a sample frothe surface of the <br /> e sample was then examined for hydrocarbon odor, sheen, <br /> emulsion, and floating product. Approximately 2.1 feet of <br /> floating product was detected in monitoring <br /> well S-1. Moderate <br /> to strong product odor and a slight hydrocarbon sheen was noted <br /> in MW-1 and 199-2 (Table 2) . Wells r:W-1 and MW-2 were then <br /> developed by air jetting, swabbing, and pumping until the <br /> water was relatively free of suspended sediment. The <br /> discharge Transportation 17E <br /> discharged water was Placed into Department of <br /> remain the <br /> Seel drums and left on site. These drums <br /> responsibility of U.S.A. Petroleum. <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> SUBJECTA E OF LLS <br /> ATION NO 110 <br /> DEPTH FLOATING PRODUCT EMULSION <br /> TO ODOR SHEEN <br /> WATER PRODUCT <br /> WELL NO- 1987 NA August 20, ' VERy STRONG NONE <br /> NE <br /> SL <br /> S-1 NOT MEASURED NONE STRONG NO <br /> MW-1 47.07' NONE STRONG SLIGHT <br /> MW-2 48.61' <br /> 1987 NA NONE <br /> September 17, 2.1, VERY STRONG NONE <br /> 51.35(49.62'0 SLIGHT <br /> 5-1 STRONG SLIGHT NONE <br /> MW-1 48.b2' NONE STRONG <br /> n_2 49.43' product (see text) <br /> n = compensated for floating P <br /> NA = not applicable <br /> Applied GeoSysteins <br />