Laserfiche WebLink
" 1 <br /> i <br /> 12 August 1996 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 95-0120 <br /> ' Page 3 of 4 <br /> ground water samples collected from MW-1 through MW-3 at concentrations of 92 Pg/1, 270 erg/l, <br /> ' and 130 ,ug/l, respectively <br /> z <br /> ' BTE&X and MTBE were not detected in any ground water samples collected in June 1996 The <br /> laboratory report (AAL Laboratory Batch No 96-0613-010-01 through 03) and chain-of-custody <br /> form are included in Appendix B <br /> i <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' Ground water flow direction remained relativelyconstant at the site over the past two ears, flowing <br /> p Y g <br /> to the south to southeasterly direction Under that condition, monitoring well MW-1 is consistently <br /> ' located in an up-gradient location from the former UST area, while monitoring wells MW-2 and <br /> MW-3 are situated in the down-gradient position <br /> ' During this monitoring period,the ground water surface was between 0 88 feet and 144' <br /> feet above <br /> the top of screen intervals in monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-3 Typically, the sand filter pack <br /> of these ground water monitoring wells extend between 2 and 3 feet above the slotted interval <br /> Therefore, the analytical results of the samples are considered representative of the aquifer <br /> ' Based upon the low to moderate concentrations of hydrocarbon compound in the ground water over <br /> the monitoring periods since 1993,the concentration of hydrocarbon compounds leached from the <br /> vadose (soil) zone, reaching and impacting the water table appears to be relatively,minor The <br /> majority of the hydrocarbon-impacted soil was previously removed As hydrocarbons commonly are <br /> held by adsorption to clay and silt, most of the hydrocarbons remaining in the soil are probably <br /> adhering to the fine soilp articles and have little mobility ` <br /> We recommend further monitoring and sampling of the ground water monitoring wells for two <br /> ' periods If the monitoring results indicate that the hydrocarbon concentrations are decreasing and/or <br /> stable, a consideration for site closure is recommended <br /> 5.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> ' Our professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were ibased upon <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the geologic/hydrogeologic <br /> ' conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a limited number of <br /> available data points (i a monitoring wells) and subsurface conditions may vary away from these <br /> data points No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional <br /> t <br />