Laserfiche WebLink
. 17 April 1996 <br /> ' AGE-NC Project No 95-0120 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> ' 3 3 BORING LOGS <br /> During drilling activities, sample duplicates were described on boring logs using the Unified Soil <br /> Classification System (USCS), and monitored for the presence of organic vapors using a photo- <br /> ionization detector (PID Thermo Environmental 580A, 10 0 eV, calibrated to isobutylene) Boring <br /> ' logs are summarized in Appendix A <br /> ' 3 4 VAPOR EXTRACTION WELL COMPLETION <br /> VWl through VW3 were completed as 2-inch diameter soil vapor extraction (SVE) wells Boring <br /> locations are illustrated in Figure 2 -Site Plcai As-built SVE well construction diagrams are included <br /> as Figures 3 through 5 Bentonite was utilized at the bottom of each boring to create a plug A well <br /> casing was emplaced through the hollow stem of the augers The augers were incrementally raised <br /> as a 93 Lonestar Lapis Luster sand was slowly poured down the annulus between the well casing and <br /> the inner wall of the hollow stem auger A filter pack was placed adjacent to the screen (0 020 inch <br /> screen size) from the bottom of the screen to a point approximately 2 feet above the top of the screen <br /> A 2-foot seal of bentonite chips was placed above the filter pack and hydrated with clean tap water <br /> The remaining annular space was sealed to the surface with Portland cement <br /> 3 5 QUARTERLY MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> ' On 31 October 1995 and 08 February 1996, ground water depths and well depths in all wells were <br /> measured to the nearest 0 01 foot utilizing a Solist water level meter After water levels were <br /> ' measured, approximately 7 to 9 gallons of water (a minimum of three well volumes) were purged <br /> from each well utilizing disposable teflon bailers Temperature, pH and conductivity were measured <br /> at well volume intervals using an ICM model 52200 water analyzer Stabilization data and field logs <br /> ' are included in Appendix B Purged water was stored in 55-gallon drums stored on-site in an area <br /> inaccessible to the general public <br /> ' After purging, each well was allowed to recover for a minimum of one hour prior to sample <br /> collection Water samples were collected from each well using dedicated, disposable polyethylene <br /> bailers and new nylon rope Sufficient sample was collected from each well to fill three 40-m1 EPA <br /> vials containing hydrochloric acid as a preservative, and one 1-liter amber bottle Care was taken to <br /> ensure that no air bubbles were present in the VOAs after filling and capping Ground-water sample <br /> containers were labeled with the well designation, date, time, and samplers initials <br /> ' <br /> Followng collection, each sample was logged on a chain-of-custody, placed in a chilled container and <br /> g p <br /> transported to Alpha Analytical Laboratories (AAL) in Atwater, California Ground water samples <br /> were analyzed for TPH-g, TPH-d and BTE&X in accordance with EPA methods 8015 modified for <br />