Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 1 I�t�NA <br /> Working To Restore Nature <br /> CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1 The soil and groundwater analytical data indicate that petroleum hydrocarbon analytes have not <br /> impacted the capillary fringe soils or the groundwater in the vicinity of well MW-2 <br /> ' The depth to groundwater in conjunction with the survey data indicate that the water bearing <br /> zone in the facility well may be in hydrologic continuity with the water beanng zone of well <br /> MW-1 and MW-2 Verification of the hydrologic continuity of the facility well (FW) with the <br /> monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-2 should be possible in October when the pumping frequency <br /> and rate of the facility well will be reduced RESNA recommends including the facility well <br /> in the monitoring and sampling program during the October <br /> 1 <br /> REFERENCES <br /> 1 <br /> State of California, Department of Water Resources 1981, Water Well Standards State of <br /> 1 California, Bulletin 74-81, 92pp <br /> US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Soil Service of San Joaquin County, <br /> 180 Jacktone clay, 75pp <br /> San Joaquin County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, 1989 Groundwater Report <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> 11P M 1150W\MP0RTS%SR-0894"& 7 <br /> 1 <br />