WORK PLANS_CASE 1 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

«-+ A.?„ 6't-_R b Y.- ,K:'OI:S L-9CnR70RY CFnT:F:C7 by CE Cf _. ,S chrorr=togrcpP..y and Cirect column-to-mcss Spectrometer source ir.terfocing ore incorporated into the basic EPA protocols, the required 1 ppb sensitivities can .� be reached easily. Since the moss spectrometer is the most selective detector ovc:lob.e, interferences and misessignments are reduced dromoticelly. CCLS hcs cpplied GC/MS successfully to cll of the six compounds listed in EPA Method 8015. Detection limits of 0.1 ppb hove been obtained without using se:ective ion monitoring. These results are on file with the California Department of Health Services (Hczordous Waste Certification cnd Drinking Water Certification Branches). At the time at which EPA methods were being developed, economical, outomoted GC/MS instrumentation was not widely available. For this reason, GC/MS wcs considered to be too costly to serve as a practical clternotive to EPA Method 8015 and such selective detector methods as EPA 8010 and 8020. Recently, Instrument costs hove fallen to the point that a GC/MS system con be purchased for little more than double that of a comparable acs chromotogroph. Moreover, positive results obtained using selective detection gas chromatography are subject to confirmation using another column (rerunning the test again) or by using GC/MS. Practical improvements in automation hove further improved the cost-effectiveness of GC/MS so that some Jobs con now be done more economically by GC/MS than by GC, particularly when confirmation is necessary. ; For example, the analysis of soils adjacent to a leaking gasoline tank should include a fuel fingerprint to determine the fuel type and the total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and EPA Method 8020 to quantify the benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX) levels. Furthermore, if leaded fuel is suspected, ethylene .r dibromide (EDB) and ethylene dichloride (EDC) should be determined cs these compounds are often added to gasoline to promote the removal of lead from the engine following combustion. EDB is a priority pollutant which is analyzed by EPA Method 8080.1 . CCAS has selected these ions which are chorocterisic of the oformentioned components from among the ions available in the full scan EPA Methods 524.1 and 624/8240. In this way we are able to determine simultaneously the most commonly requested information concerning volatile .� hydrocarbons in the environment. Furthermore, the cost for this analysis at $135 in water and $155 in soil is substantially below the sum of the three separate analyses which would otherwise be required, nomely, EPA 8015 0 $75/100. EPA 8020 0 $90/120 and EPA 8080.1 0 $75/100. Moreover, confirmation testing is not required when using GC/MS since it is the method recommended by EPA for confirmation. Furthermore, the use of internal standards is possible and thereby provides a significant quality cssuronce advantage to the method. Additional compounds such as TCA. TCE and PCE which are often used at service stations and sometimes discharged to faulty waste oil tanks con be added to the program by special request. The additional cost for this addition is not large and allows all aspects of the investigation to be handled with a single analysis. Thus it con be seen that GC/MS provides better information at a lower overall price. The GC/MS fuel fingerprint method has been shown to provide even more detailed information in cases in which depth and/or area profiles are involved. Typically. one sees a distribution of fuel components with depth which dramoticeily changes itself once groundwater is reached. ED9, for example. may be found only at the groundwater interface due to its preferential solubility in woter. Heavier, biorefroctory components ore retained by the soil nearer Page 7 .d CENTRAL CCLST 4%!LVT:CAL SERV:CES San Luis Ctispo. Californio (825) 5,3-2553