My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_NOTICE OF INTENT FOR INSTALLATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN OZONE INJECTION GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
601
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506054
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_NOTICE OF INTENT FOR INSTALLATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN OZONE INJECTION GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2020 10:09:52 PM
Creation date
3/13/2020 4:54:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
NOTICE OF INTENT FOR INSTALLATION, OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF AN OZONE INJECTION GROUNDWATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM
RECORD_ID
PR0506054
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007173
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER VINTAGE CARWASH (VACANT LOT)
STREET_NUMBER
601
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13931025
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
601 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
588
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ' 2.5.3 Supplemental Sampling Results <br /> ' Bromate, CrVI and acetone were reported at similar concentrations throughout the pilot testing <br /> activities, with no increasing concentration trends evident as a result of ozonation. The supplemental <br /> ' sampling results of the OS testing are presented in Table 4. <br /> 2.5.4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control <br /> The field QA/QC implemented for the OS pilot test included the collection and submittal of one <br /> duplicate groundwater sample during each groundwater monitoring event. The duplicate samples were <br /> ' collected randomly from selected wells and labeled as either MW-14, a non-existent monitoring well, <br /> or mistakenly labeled after the preexisting well, MW-12. Well MW-12 was not sampled for the entire <br /> ' duration of the pilot testing and any references to MW-12 in the Well Sampling Data Sheets and <br /> laboratory analytical data included herein refers specifically to one or more field duplicates. When <br /> comparing the results of primary samples with their respective duplicate samples, each of the analyzed <br /> ' contaminants were reported at the same or similar concentrations for each of the duplicate samples, <br /> thus showing good repeatability. <br /> We also reviewed the QA/QC data provided with the MTL, BSK and CLS analytical laboratory <br /> reports. These data show acceptable surrogate recoveries and non-detect results for each of the method <br /> blanks and acceptable recoveries and relative percent differences for each of the matrix spikes and <br /> matrix spike duplicates. Appropriate recoveries were noted for each of the laboratory control samples. <br /> Based on the field and laboratory QA/QC data, no qualification of the data presented herein is <br /> necessary, and the data are of sufficient quality for the purposes of this report. <br /> II <br /> 1 <br /> �I <br /> 'I <br /> II <br /> 'I <br /> Project No.59183-06-02 - 8- July 2,2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.