My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_WELL INSTALLATION AND SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MCKINLEY
>
19589
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0525999
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_WELL INSTALLATION AND SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 2:45:14 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 1:52:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
WELL INSTALLATION AND SOIL AND GROUNDWATER SAMPLING
RECORD_ID
PR0525999
PE
2951
FACILITY_ID
FA0017597
FACILITY_NAME
DANNA FARMS INC
STREET_NUMBER
19589
STREET_NAME
MCKINLEY
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
24126002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
19589 MCKINLEY AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' LIGHT, AIR & SPACE CONSTRUCTION <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY <br /> ' State Contractor's License Number 445403 <br /> State EPA R.E.A.Number 04072 <br /> Office 408-979-0661 <br /> On the basis of the water data from the pits, the EHD requested further assessment of the <br /> groundwater and the site by performed by installing groundwater monitoring wells. Three <br /> ' monitoring well locations were discussed and approved with a representative of EHD and this <br /> report presents the installation and sampling of those wells. Ten four-point composite soil <br /> samples were also collected in October 2008 from the stockpile aeration area for chemical <br /> ' analysis and are presented in this report. Soil samples were obtained from approximate depths of <br /> 6"-12" and 18"-24" at pre-selected and locations and the samples were composited by depth for <br /> analysis by the lab. <br /> ' 2.0 Exploratory Boring Drilling and Sampling <br /> ' 2.1 Introduction <br /> Three exploratory borings were drilled using hollow-stem augers at the locations shown on <br /> ' Figure 2. The borings and wells were permitted through EHD and an underground utility alert <br /> (USA) was called and the site utilities located prior to doing fieldwork. The wells were placed as <br /> close as practical to the original UST pits. Soil samples were taken at 5-foot increments and at <br /> ' intervals of geologic interest or obvious or suspected contamination to the total borehole depth. <br /> Additional samples were collected at the discretion of the supervising geologist. All logging was <br /> performed using the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS), together with pertinent geologic <br /> ' observations as appropriate for the site subsurface geology description. <br /> 2.2 Decontamination <br /> ' All augers were thoroughly steam-cleaned prior to arriving at the site. The driller brought <br /> adequate clean auger to complete all of the wells without reusing auger sections. All soil <br /> sampling tools (split spoons, cores, etc.) were disassembled, steam-cleaned or cleaned in soapy <br /> ' (TSP) water, rinsed with clean tap water prior to taking each sample. The cleaned tools were <br /> then reassembled with clean brass sample liners for the next sample collection. The drill rig was <br /> decontaminated prior to leaving the site. Contaminated drill cuttings and the soil samples not <br /> retained for chemical analysis, together with well purge, cleanup and cement mixing water were <br /> placed in labeled, closed top 55-gallon drums pending chemical analysis. The Client is <br /> responsible for proper storage and disposal of contaminated materials. <br /> 1 2.3 Soil Sampling and Logging <br /> Split spoon soil samples in the brass liners in the sampling tool (depending on sample recovery) <br /> ' were retained for chemical or physical testing. The samples were labeled and sealed in the field <br /> in their original liners. Sample liners ends were sealed with aluminum foil or Teflon®, capped <br /> { with clean cap plugs, and labeled and logged onto chain of custody forms. <br /> 1 <br /> ' January 5 2009 Page 2 of 12 <br /> MAIN OFFICE • 1707 LITTLE ORCHARD STREET, SUTTF.A• SAN JOSE•CA•95125 <br /> MAILING ADDRESS•P.O.Box 36303•SAN JOSE•CA•95158-6303 •408/979-0661 -408/979-0621 FAX•I XSMNS I,' V n E-MAIL <br /> ' GENERAL AND ENGINEERING CONTRACTOR•HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE RENIOVAL CONTRACTOR'SITE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSEISNIEN71 <br /> WETLAND AND RIPARIAN HABITAT—ASSESSMENT—DESIGN—RESTORATION—CONSTRUCTION—MITIGATION MONITORING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.