My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0081473
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
11065
>
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
>
SR0081473
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 4:52:30 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 2:02:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0081473
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
11065
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
06304023
ENTERED_DATE
11/26/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11065 N ALPINE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Suitability I Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Whitlow Property , Stockton, CA <br /> November 20, 2019 Terracon Project No. NA197078 <br /> According to the California Department of Water Resources, Groundwater Information Center <br /> Interactive Map, depth to groundwater was reported between approximately 90 and 100 feet bgs <br /> in Spring 2018 and approximately 130 and 140 feet in Fall 2018. The groundwater flow direction <br /> and the depth to shallow, unconfined groundwater, if present, would likely vary depending upon <br /> seasonal variations in rainfall and other hydrogeological features. Without the benefit of on-site <br /> groundwater monitoring wells surveyed to a datum, groundwater depth and flow direction beneath <br /> the site cannot be directly ascertained. <br /> 1.4.2 Potential Groundwater Contamination Issues <br /> Potential groundwater contamination can occur from a number of sources including historical <br /> petroleum hydrocarbon use, agricultural activities, dairies, septic systems, and storm water <br /> infiltration. As per EHD requirements nitrate as N and 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane(DBCP) have <br /> been included as part of the SSS discussion. Identifying potential groundwater contamination <br /> other than nitrates and DBCP is beyond the scope of work for this report. <br /> The presence of nitrates is not uncommon in shallow groundwater aquifers in San Joaquin County <br /> and other parts of the Central Valley. Nitrate in groundwater occurs as a result of the application <br /> of fertilizers, livestock waste, and untreated septic tank waste. Nitrate is mobile and often <br /> accumulates in the shallow groundwater zones. <br /> In the early 1900s, natural levels of nitrate in groundwater were measured in forty-three (43)wells <br /> throughout the Sacramento Valley by Kirk Bryan (1923). It was thought that groundwater at that <br /> time was close to "natural" conditions. Based on the work by Bryan, it is estimated that under <br /> "natural" conditions, groundwater concentration containing nitrate is no more than about 13.5 <br /> milligrams per liter(mg/L) nitrate (NO3) or (3 mg/L-N). Areas having 24.75 mg/L-NO3 (5.5 mg/L- <br /> N) or more, are those in which nitrate concentrations may be increasing (Hull, 1984). <br /> DBCP (dibromochloropropane) is a nematocide and soil fumigant for vegetables and grapes. It <br /> is thought to cause health problems consisting of kidney damage, liver damage, and cancer. The <br /> use of DBCP was discontinued in 1979. <br /> Based on a review of the DWR Water Data Library, in the 1970s, a groundwater well located <br /> within 0.36 miles north of the site, was analyzed for various constituents including nitrate. <br /> Dissolved nitrate as N was reported in the well between approximately 0.56 and 2.7 mg/L-N below <br /> the EPA MCL of 10 mg/L-N. Based on a review of the State Water Resources Control Board <br /> online map, there were no nitrate impacted wells identified near the site. <br /> Based on the historical information, the past agricultural land use and septic systems in the area <br /> should be considered potential groundwater contamination sources. Refer to Section 1.3.2 for <br /> further discussion for information regarding the site groundwater well. <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.