My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SR0081473
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
ALPINE
>
11065
>
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
>
SR0081473
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 4:52:30 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 2:02:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
4200/4300 - Liquid Waste/Water Well Permits
FileName_PostFix
SSNL
RECORD_ID
SR0081473
PE
2602
STREET_NUMBER
11065
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
ALPINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
APN
06304023
ENTERED_DATE
11/26/2019 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
11065 N ALPINE RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Soil Suitability/ Nitrate Loading Study Irerracon <br /> Whitlow Property , Stockton, CA <br /> November 20, 2019 Terracon Project No. NA197078 <br /> 1.6.7 Discussion of Percolation Test Results <br /> Based on the percolation tests, boring B1 (3.5 feet bgs) failed to demonstrate a satisfactory <br /> percolation rate due to the clay soils present at shallow depths. Borings B4 (16 feet bgs), B5 (18 <br /> feet bgs), and B6 (7 feet bgs)demonstrated a relatively steady percolation rate between 125 and <br /> 250 minutes per inch throughout the testing period with the exception of one or two zero readings <br /> which resulted in a zero percolation rate. Boring B3 was tested twice once at 25 feet bgs which <br /> failed to percolate sufficiently due to very dense soils at depth. A sand lense was encountered at <br /> approximately 21 feet bgs in boring 133; therefore, Terracon backfilled the boring with <br /> approximately 4 feet of gravel and conducted a second percolation test at 21 feet bgs which <br /> demonstrated in a passing percolation rate of 27.7 minutes per inch. There was a question as to <br /> which percolation rate the EHD would accept; however, on November 7, 2019, Terracon was <br /> informed by Mr. Michael Kith that the passing percolation rate at boring B3 was acceptable. <br /> 1.6.8 Discussion of Septic System Sizing <br /> In general, septic system construction should follow the San Joaquin County On-Site Wastewater <br /> Treatment Standards (OWTS) where applicable. The color coded map of San Joaquin County <br /> available at the EHD indicates the site is located in a clay zone where leach lines with pits are <br /> permitted. Refer to the OWTS Table 9.7.1 — Standard OWTS Design Requirements (page 28 of <br /> 40)for septic tank and leach line sizing recommendations. <br /> 2.0 NITRATE LOADING STUDY <br /> Because of concern regarding nitrate leaching into groundwater from septic systems, a nitrate <br /> loading analysis is required by the EHD for the proposed development to determine the potential <br /> concentration of percolating effluent and rain fall over the long term. Where percolating effluent <br /> leaches into the ground, groundwater quality may be impacted to some degree should the effluent <br /> reach groundwater. <br /> The method utilized for the nitrate loading analysis is based on a simple mass balance formula, <br /> discussed in a published article by Hantzsche and Finnemore (1992), which provides a <br /> convenient and simplified method to estimate long-term groundwater nitrate impacts on an area- <br /> wide basis. <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore found that over a long period of time, water quality in the upper <br /> saturated groundwater zone closely approximates the quality of percolating recharge waters. <br /> They believe that their method is a good planning tool and provides useful information to planners <br /> and local officials but with some real limitations. In their article published in Ground Water, <br /> Hantzsche and Finnemore mention that "...the equation ignores dispersion, lateral flow, and <br /> mixing with groundwater flow from up-gradient areas. These processes would generally <br /> contribute to additional reduction of nitrate-nitrogen concentrations in groundwater to the extent <br /> that the nitrate-nitrogen concentration of groundwater flow from up-gradient areas is lower." <br /> Responsive ■ Resourceful ■ Reliable 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.