Laserfiche WebLink
A <br /> PUBLIC #1EALTH SERVICES <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISION y , <br /> Ernest M. Fujimoto, M. D., M.P.H., Acting Health Officer <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton CA 9520 <br /> 209/468-3420 rnIF <br /> 7 Ra <br /> L <br /> BOB BOOST JUN 2 5 1997 <br /> UNOCAL <br /> 2000 CROW CANYON PL STE 400 <br /> SAN RAMON CA 94583 <br /> RE: 437 East Miner Ave., Stockton CA 95202 SITE CODE: 1181 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) has completed review <br /> of the Unocal correspondence dated June 11, 1997. PHS/EHD has prepared the following comments for <br /> your clarification and response. <br /> Your correspondence included a copy of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board's <br /> (Region 2), Low Risk Criteria. PHS/EHD has reviewed Region 2's interpretation of their basin plan. The <br /> above referenced site is located in San Joaquin County which is situated within the San Joaquin River Basin <br /> of the Central Valley Region. <br /> The Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board adopted the "Third Edition of the Water Quality <br /> Control Plan (Basin Plan) for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins" on December 9, 1994 <br /> which was approved by the State Water Resources Control Board on February 16, 1995. The Basin Plan <br /> has designated all ground waters in San Joaquin County as suitable or potentially suitable (at minimum) <br /> for municipal and domestic water supply, agricultural supply, industrial service supply and industrial <br /> process supply. At a minimum, water designated for use as domestic or municipal supply shall not <br /> contain concentrations of chemical constituents in excess of the maximum contaminant levels as specified <br /> in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulation. <br /> The groundwater monitoring data, that has been collected since the unauthorized release was <br /> documented, clearly indicates that the operation of underground storage tanks has degraded water <br /> quality beneath the site. The State Water Resources Control Board Policy 92-49 states that the Regional <br /> r Water Quality Control Board is to ensure that dischargers are required to clean up and abate the effects of <br /> discharges in a manner that promotes attainment of either background water quality, or the best water <br /> quality which is reasonable. If background levels of water quality cannot be restored 92-49 allows for the <br /> approval of alternative cleanup levels. The alternate cleanup levels that may be approved that are less <br /> stringent than background must be consistent with §2725 of the Underground Storage Tank Regulations <br /> which refers to the Basin Plan which in turn references the maximum contaminant levels that are specified <br /> in Title 22. Also alternative cleanup levels shall be consistent with the maximum benefit to the people of <br /> the state; not unreasonably affect present and anticipated beneficial use of such water and not result in <br /> water quality less than that prescribed in the Water Quality Control Plan and Policies adopted by the State <br /> and Regional Water Boards. <br /> PHS/EHD has reviewed the soil contamination evidenced and has determined that the contamination <br /> summarized below is in contact with groundwater. The most recent reported depth to groundwater <br /> (February 3, 1997) was approximately 33 feet below ground surface while groundwater as low as 47.91 <br /> feet has been reported (November 17, 1994). PHS/EHD has also indicated that the vertical extent of the <br /> adsorbed and dissolved petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has not been determined. <br /> Sample ID TPH- as Benzene Toluene Eth (benzene Xylene <br /> UL@ 45 feet 19,000 mg/kg 140 mq/kq m /k900 mg/kq mg/k370 mg/kq mg/k1,600 m /k <br /> UV7@ 35 feet 20,000 mq/kq m /k99 mg/kg 670 mg/kg 340 mg/kg 1,500 m /k <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Cam Services <br />