Laserfiche WebLink
Work Plan for Additional Subsurface Investigation @ Former Unocal Station 90187 <br /> November 12, 1999 <br /> site. The ESA identified a former station located at 448 East Miner Avenue, south of the subject site. <br /> Historical groundwater data indicate that this former station is upgradient of the subject site. Environmental <br /> information related to the soil and groundwater conditions beneath this former service station were not <br /> obtained during the ESA. Environmental data related to surrounding properties in the vicinity of the subject <br /> site are discussed in GSI Report No.4827.04-1,Limited Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment,dated May <br /> 11, 1995. <br /> To further assess on-site and off-site subsurface conditions, GSI installed three on-site groundwater <br /> monitoring wells(U-4 through U-6)and two off-site groundwater monitoring wells(U-7 and U-8), drilled <br /> two on-site exploratory soil borings(U-N and U-O),and installed one on-site vapor extraction well (UV-1) <br /> in August 1995. TPHg or benzene were not detected in soil samples collected from borings U-5 through <br /> U-7 or U-O. TPHg were detected in a soil sample collected from boring U-N at 25 feet bgs (1.7 ppm). <br /> TPHg and benzene were detected in a soil sample collected from well boring U-4 at 10 feet bgs (41 and <br /> 0.011 ppm, respectively). TPHg were detected in the three soil samples collected from well boring UV-1 <br /> at 25,35,and 40 feet bgs at concentrations ranging from 3,400 to 20,000 ppm. Benzene was detected in the <br /> soil samples collected at 35 feet (99 ppm) and 40 feet bgs (15 ppm) in boring UV-1. Results of this <br /> subsurface investigation are presented in GSI Report No. 4827.04-3, Well Installation and Soil Boring <br /> Report, dated October 9, 1995. <br /> Based on the subsurface data gathered to date,a Soil Remediation Feasibility Study Work Plan(GSI Report <br /> No.4827.05-1,April 30, 1996)was prepared that proposed a vapor extraction test(VET)to evaluate whether <br /> soil vapor extraction was a possible remedial alternative at this site. This work plan has not been <br /> implemented due to rising groundwater that submerged the impacted soil targeted for inclusion in the <br /> feasibility study. <br /> In May 1997, GSI conducted a search of Department of Water Resources files in Sacramento, California, <br /> for domestic and municipal supply wells located within a 0.5-mile radius of the subject site. GSI identified <br /> twelve sites with wells within the area searched. Six sites were identified as domestic water supply wells, <br /> four sites as municipal water supply wells, and two sites as industrial supply wells. The nearest <br /> downgradient well (classified as municipal)was reported to be located approximately 1,580 feet from the <br /> subject site. Well search data were included in GSI's Well Installation Report(No.482721-2,October 21, <br /> 1997). <br /> As reported in the same document (Well Installation Report No. 482721-2, GSI, October 21, 1997), GSI <br /> installed off-site groundwater monitoring well U-9 in an attempt to delineate the downgradient edge of the <br /> dissolved plume. Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in the three soil samples from the well boring <br /> that were submitted for analysis. The groundwater sample from the well initially contained TPHg(990 parts <br /> per billion, or ppb), benzene (130 ppb), and methyl tert-butyl ether (MtBE) (12 ppb). Drilling and well <br /> installation data are presented in GSI's Well Installation Report(No. 482721-2), dated October 21, 1997. <br /> Two nested piezometer wells NP-I and NP-2 were installed by ARCADIS Geraghty&Miller in November <br /> 1998(NP-1),and January 1999(NP-2). Well NP-I was installed near the southeast corner of the subject site <br /> and well NP-2 was installed off-site,downgradient of on-site well U-3,across California Street(Figure 3). <br /> 240042.05 3 <br />