My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
437
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0541875
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 3:49:54 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 2:13:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0541875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024017
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON SITE 306415
STREET_NUMBER
437
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
1392417
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
437 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARCADIS GERAGHTY&MILLER <br /> Comment: In paragraph 6, your letter states, "PHS/EHD questions the <br /> definition of a confining layer being 3 feet thick ..." <br /> Response: It was not the intent of ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller to indicate <br /> that encountering a 3 foot thick confining unit was evidence of a <br /> continuous area-wide confining layer. It is not known whether such <br /> a layer does or does not exist. Rather, the reason that drilling will <br /> be halted when encountering such a confining layer is that the layer <br /> might constitute a barrier to vertical migration of site constituents <br /> which could be compromised by drilling though. ARCADIS <br /> Geraghty and Miller will evaluate all available data to assess the <br /> area] extent of encountered potential confining layers. A soil <br /> sample will be collected within the base of any encountered 3-foot <br /> confining zone and analyzed for soil moisture and site constituents <br /> of interest, along with all other available relevant site data, to <br /> determine whether petroleum hydrocarbons have migrated through, <br /> or are capable of aqueous migration through, the confining zone at <br /> the point of sampling. <br /> SJCPHS <br /> Comment: In paragraph 7, your letter states, "Collection of groundwater <br /> samples at a minimum of 10 foot intervals from first encountered <br /> water to 50 feet is acceptable. After that depth samples should be <br /> collected at changes in lithology or a maximum of 10 foot <br /> intervals." <br /> Response: The comment is acknowledged and samples will be collected as <br /> suggested in the comment. <br /> Comment: In paragraph 9, your letter states that if MTBE is detected in any <br /> samples using EPA method 8020, they should be reanalyzed for a <br /> specified suite of compounds using EPA method 8260A. <br /> Response: The comment is acknowledged and samples will be collected and <br /> analyzed as suggested in the comment. <br /> Comment: In paragraph 10, your letter states that "the size of hollow stem <br /> auger to be used for drilling should be specified. <br /> Response: The specified size of the hollow stem auger is 8 1/4 inches outside <br /> diameter. <br /> At the direction of UNOCAL, ARCADIS Geraghty and Miller has addressed <br /> the comments in your letter cited above and submits this document as an addendum to <br /> the work plan also cited above. If you have any questions or comments regarding this <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.