Laserfiche WebLink
Work Plan for Additional Subsurface Assessment and Remedial Action—Former Unocal Station#0187 <br /> November 27,2001 <br /> The dissolved hydrocarbon plume in Zone C is delineated to the west (upgradient), north, and southeast, <br /> but not downgradient (east to northeast) of the Unocal site. Dissolved hydrocarbons were detected in <br /> wells U-10, NP-2-116, U-12, U-19, and U-21, with a trace concentration of benzene detected in well <br /> U-17 (0.97 parts per billion, or ppb). Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPHg) and benzene <br /> concentrations detected in Zone C wells range from 170 to 710 ppb, and 0.97 to 120 ppb, respectively, <br /> with concentrations diminishing toward the perimeter of the plume. <br /> Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling <br /> Quarterly monitoring and sampling of the groundwater monitoring wells began in August 1994. During <br /> the most recent sampling event on August 13 through 15, 2001, TPHg range hydrocarbons were reported <br /> at concentrations ranging from 84 to 10,000 ppb, and benzene concentrations ranged from 0.97 to 3,800 <br /> ppb. MtBE was not detected in any well by EPA Method 8260B. The highest concentrations of TPHg <br /> range hydrocarbons and benzene were detected in well NP-2-60. Depth to groundwater ranged from <br /> 23.77 to 28.48 feet below top of casing, and the groundwater flow direction was in a northeasterly <br /> direction at a gradient ranging from 0.002 to 0.01. Quarterly sampling and monitoring of the wells is <br /> performed by GR. Historical groundwater chemical analytical data are summarized in the most recent <br /> GR report (Third Quarter 2001 Groundwater Monitoring and Sampling Report, dated September 27, <br /> 2001). <br /> Remedial Actions <br /> GR personnel performed a five-day vapor extraction (VE)pilot test at the site from November 27 through <br /> December 1, 2000. The VE system operated for a total of 40 hours, and soil vapors were extracted from <br /> wells UV-1, UV-2, and UV-3. The purpose of the VE pilot test was to evaluate the feasibility of the VE <br /> technology and collect needed site specific data for the design of a VE system if deemed necessary. The <br /> conclusion of the VE pilot test was that VE technology is not appropriate for this site. <br /> From December 2000 through July 2001, GR performed an interim remedial action test of the existing <br /> ozone microsparging system. The system was operated continuously over this period of time and <br /> groundwater samples were collected from surrounding groundwater monitoring wells to evaluate the <br /> effectiveness of the system. Groundwater samples were collected weekly for the first three months, then <br /> every two weeks through the end of the test. The results of the test show that the system was successful <br /> in significantly reducing dissolved hydrocarbon concentrations in the groundwater beneath the site, and <br /> there were some indications that the treatment system might be reducing concentrations in downgradient <br /> wells. Based on these results, the system continues to operate. <br /> SCOPE OF WORK <br /> In order to further delineate the downgradient extent of the dissolved hydrocarbon plume in Zone C, and <br /> to expand the ozone microsparging remedial system, GR proposes to install one additional off-site <br /> groundwater monitoring well, and install and operate two additional on-site and six off-site ozone <br /> microsparging wells at the locations shown on Figures 2 and 3. GR Field Methods and Procedures are <br /> included in Appendix A. <br /> 240042.11 3 <br />