My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012061
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
437
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0541875
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012061
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 7:29:25 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 2:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012061
RECORD_ID
PR0541875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024017
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON SITE 306415
STREET_NUMBER
437
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
1392417
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
437 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
269
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Interim Remedial Action Test Report,Former Unocal#0187, Stockton,CA <br /> August 28,2001 <br /> To further assess on-site and off-site subsurface conditions, GSI installed three on-site groundwater <br /> monitoring wells(U-4 through U-6)and two off-site groundwater monitoring wells (U-7 and U-8), drilled <br /> two on-site exploratory soil borings (U-N and U-O), and installed one on-site vapor extraction well <br /> (UV-1) in August 1995 TPHg or benzene were not detected in soil samples collected from borings U-5 <br /> through U-7 or U-O TPHg were detected in a soil sample collected from boring U-N at 25 feet bgs <br /> (1 7 ppm) TPHg and benzene were detected in a soil sample collected from well boring U-4 at 10 feet <br /> bgs (41 and 0 011 ppm, respectively) TPHg were detected in the three soil samples collected from well <br /> boring UV-1 at 25, 35, and 40 feet bgs at concentrations ranging from 3,400 to 20,000 ppm Benzene <br /> was detected in the soil samples collected at 35 feet bgs (99 ppm) and 40 feet bgs (15 ppm) in boring <br /> UV-1 Results of this subsurface investigation are presented in GSI report No 4827 04-3, Well <br /> Installation and Soil Boring Report,dated October 9, 1995 <br /> Based on the subsurface data gathered to date, a Soil Remediation Feasibility Study Work Plan (GSI <br /> Report No 4827 05-1, April 30, 1996) was prepared that proposed a vapor extraction test (VET) to <br /> evaluate whether soil vapor extraction was a possible remedial alternative at this site This work plan was <br /> not implemented at that time due to rising groundwater that submerged the impacted soil targeted for <br /> inclusion in the feasibility study <br /> In May 1997, GSI conducted a search of Department of Water Resources (DWR) files in Sacramento, <br /> California, for domestic and municipal supply wells located within a 0 5-mile radius of the subject site <br /> • GSI identified twelve sites with wells within the area searched Six sites were identified as domestic <br /> water supply wells, four sites as municipal water supply wells, and two sites as industrial supply wells <br /> The nearest downgradient well (classified as municipal) was reported to be located approximately 1,580 <br /> feet from the subject site Well search data were included in GSI's Well Installation Report <br /> (No 482721-2, dated October 21, 1997) <br /> As reported in the same document, GSI installed off-site groundwater monitoring well U-9 in an attempt <br /> to delineate the downgradient edge of the dissolved plume Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in <br /> the three soil samples from the well boring that were submitted for analysis The groundwater sample <br /> from the well initially contained TPHg (990 parts per billion, or ppb), benzene (130 ppb), and methyl <br /> tert-butyl ether,or MtBE(12 ppb) <br /> Two nested piezometer wells NP-1 and NP-2 were installed by ARCADIS Geraghty & Miller in <br /> November 1998 (NP-1) and January 1999 (NP-2) Well NP-1 was installed near the southeast corner of <br /> the subject site and well NP-2 was installed off-site, downgradient of on-site well U-3, across California <br /> Street(Figure 4) TPHg(up to 420 ppm)and benzene(up to 3 0 ppm)were detected in soil samples from <br /> well NP-1, mainly in the interval from 32 to 80 feet bgs Discrete groundwater samples collected from <br /> NP-I had concentrations of TPHg and benzene of up to 73,000 and 4,200 ppb, respectively MtBE by <br /> EPA Method 8260 was not detected to either soil or grab groundwater samples from this boring Soil <br /> samples from well NP-2 contained concentrations of TPHg and benzene of up to 1 5 and 0 18 ppm, <br /> respectively, and discrete groundwater samples contained TPHg and benzene at concentrations up to <br /> 4,000 and 1,200 ppb, respectively MtBE by EPA Method 8020 was not detected in soil or grab <br /> groundwater samples from this boring Results of this subsurface investigation are presented in <br /> ARCADIS Geraghty& Miller's Supplemental Site Characterization Report, dated June 3, 1999 <br /> • In May 2000, GR installed four groundwater monitoring wells downgradient of the site Well U-l0 was <br /> installed five feet north of existing nested ptezometer well NP-2 to assess the reliability of chemical <br /> analytical results from well NP-2-1I6, and wells U-11 through U-13 were installed in a group <br /> 24004209-1 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.