My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012148
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MINER
>
437
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0541875
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012148
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/16/2020 5:49:49 PM
Creation date
3/16/2020 3:10:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012148
RECORD_ID
PR0541875
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0024017
FACILITY_NAME
CHEVRON SITE 306415
STREET_NUMBER
437
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MINER
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
1392417
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
437 E MINER AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
152
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES Uro <br /> SAN]OAQUIN COUNTY <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DIVISIONKaren Furst, M D , M PH , Health Officer304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor • Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> 209/468-3420 <br /> BOB BOUST <br /> UNOCAL CORPORATION DEC, 10 N7 <br /> 2121 N CALIFORNIA BLVD STE 250 <br /> WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 <br /> RE 437 East Miner Ave ,Stockton CA 95202 SITE CODE I I&I <br /> Stockton CA 95202 <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Environmental Health Division (PHS/EHD) has completed <br /> review of the GeoStrategies "Work Plan and Feasibility Study"dated October 9, 1997 and the "Well <br /> Installation Report"dated October 21, 1997 PHS/EHD has prepared the following comments for your <br /> information and response <br /> The work plan proposed to install one monitoring well to delineate the lateral extent of hydrocarbon- <br /> impacted groundwater The monitoring well was proposed to be located approximately 120 feet <br /> downgradient of the newly installed well,U-9 The well was proposed to be installed within an 8 inch <br /> diameter borehole that will be drilled to a total depth of approximately 5 5 feet below ground surface <br /> (bgs) The work plan proposed that the well be constructed with 30 feet of screened interval The <br /> work plan proposed that at minimum two soil samples would be submitted for laboratory analysis <br /> utilizing EPA Method 8015 Modified and 8020 The well will subsequently be surveyed by a <br /> California licensed surveyor,developed and sampled <br /> The monitoring well, U-9,which was installed on August 19, 1997,is located approximately 180 feet <br /> downgradient of one of the former tank complexes which evidenced petroleum hydrocarbon <br /> contamination This well was installed with 30 feet of screened interval (25-55 feet bgs) which <br /> PHS/EHD has specifically disapproved in prior correspondence The reported depth to water prior to <br /> well development and sampling on August 26, 1997 was approximately 33 feet bgs, indicating a water <br /> column of 22 feet within the screened interval The sample collected evidenced 990 ppb TPH-gas, 130 <br /> ppb benzene,and 30 ppb xylene The sample had been diluted and the detection limits elevated The <br /> report incorrectly indicated that 12 ppb methyl tertiary butyl ether had been detected when the <br /> accompanying lab report stated that none was detected at the detection limit of 12 ppb AIso,the <br /> report failed to include appropriate tracking documentation for the soil cuttings disposed of at Forward <br /> Inc <br /> The feasibility study proposed to evaluate natural attenuation as a remedial alternative,because "site <br /> conditions do not appear to warrant implementation of the soil vapor extraction feasibility study at this <br /> time"and "The highest concentrations of residual hydrocarbons are below water which indicates that <br /> vapor extraction is not an effective remedial alternative at this time " The proposed feasibility study <br /> cited rising water levels and decreasing hydrocarbon concentrations over the last three years as the <br /> basis for the conclusion that the "groundwater plume does not appear to be migrating at this time <br /> (stable plume)" The proposed feasibility study includes quarterly groundwater monitoring for a <br /> minimum period of one year This monitoring data,including TPH-gas,BTEX,and methyl tertiary <br /> butyl ether analysis,will be used to evaluate natural attenuation and stability of the dissolved plume <br /> A Division of San Joaquin County Health Care Services <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.