Laserfiche WebLink
GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT <br /> Soil conditions were observed in continuous cores from the ground surface to maximum depths <br /> ranging from 20 to 24 feet bgs Boring lobs from this investigation are provided in Appendix B A <br /> Native subsurface materials generally consisted of fine-grained clayey sandy silts Backfill <br /> materials encountered in the UST excavation consisted of mixtures of pea gravel,compacted silt, <br /> clay,and sand The backfill materials were typically less dense than the native materials No <br /> physical signs (i e odor,discoloration)of petroleum impact were identified in any of the soil - <br /> bonngs during drilling operations <br /> Following the completion of each soil boring, a Hydro-punch in-situ groundwater-sampling tool <br /> was driven into the groundwater-bearing zone from depths ranging from 20 to 24 feet <br /> Groundwater extracted from each soil boring appeared relatively free of sediment and ESA field a <br /> geologists did not detect petroleum odors or hydrocarbon sheen on the water samples �= <br /> Laboratory analytical results of soil and groundwater samples are summarized in Table 2,below <br /> Laboratory analyses detected 11 milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)of MTBE in the soil sample <br /> collected from boring TP4 at 15 feet bgs i Analyses detected 1,300 micrograms per liter(/g/L) <br /> and 14 tig/L, of MTBE in the groundwater samples collected from borings TP-4W and TP-5W, <br /> respectively <br /> Results of the July 200 soil and groundwater assessment indicated that the low MTBE <br /> concentrations in soils appeared localized at the north and south ends of the former UST <br /> excavation and MTBE concentrations were not found to have had migrated vertically to depths <br /> below the groundwater(approximately 15 feet) Analysis of the five groundwater samples further <br /> substantiates the conclusion that the impact from residual MTBE was localized and did not <br /> suggest a laterally migrating plume of MTBE <br /> GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT, JANUARY 2001 <br /> Based upon results of ESA's first assessment in July 2000, SJCEHD requested additional <br /> groundwater data to further delineate MTBE concentrations detected in the groundwater near the <br /> northern end of the former UST ESA submitted the Additional Groundwater Assessment <br /> Workplan to SJCEHD on November 28, 2000 for review Following a strategy meeting with Ms <br /> Carol Oz of SJCEHD, Ms Dot Lofstrom of SJCEHD approved the workplan on December 19, <br /> 2000 The purpose of the additional assessment was to obtain supplementary groundwater - <br /> samples to determine the extent of MTBE in groundwater Secondarily,ESA collected select soil <br /> samples in the area of the former UST excavation for analysts of lead, as requested by the <br /> SJCEHD <br /> - - As-shown in-Figure 5;ESA c.onipleted fourteen-borings on-January-10 and-1-1,-2001-in and-- ---- ` <br /> around the former UST location Bormgs TP-9,TP-10, and TP-12 through TP-19 were drilled to <br /> 25-feet bgs for the purpose of collect ng representative;groundwater samples A Hydio=punch in-- — �l <br /> _ situ groundwater-sampling tool was used to collect groundwater and was typically driven into the <br /> groundwater-bearing zone from 21 to 25 feet bgs Groundwater samples from borings TP-9 and <br /> Milligrams per kilogram(mg/kg)is roughly equivalent to parts per million(ppm) Micrograms per kilogram <br /> (ug/kg)and micrograms per liter(ug/L.)are roughly equivalent to parts per billion(ppb) For purpose of <br /> consistency,concentrations will be presented as mg/kg ug/kg,or ug/l <br /> Groundwater Assessment Report 8 FSA 1200252 <br /> September 2003 <br />