Laserfiche WebLink
GROUNDWATER ASSESSMENT REPORT <br /> TP-13 were collected from 26 to 30 feet bgs after two faded attempts to intersect water-bearing <br /> sediments at 21 feet bgs and 16 feet bgs, respectively <br /> Additional groundwater samples were collected at 35 feet bgs from borings TP-10,TP-14,TP-15, <br /> and TP-16 to ascertain the potential vertical extent of MTBE in groundwater At these locations, <br /> the"Hydro-punch"sampling tool was driven into the groundwater-bearing zone from 31 to 35 feet <br /> bgs Groundwater was not encountered in bonng TP-14 at 35 feet bgs,therefore no sample was <br /> collected Proposed borings TP-6,TP-7,TP-8, and TP-I I were not accessible to sampling <br /> equipment dunng the fieldwork due to saturated soil conditions caused by heavy rain Laboratory <br /> analytical results of groundwater samples are summarized in Table 3 <br /> Six soil borings (TP-lA,TP-4A,TP-5A,TP-10, TP-14, and TP-15) were drilled in and <br /> immediately surrounding the former UST excavation to sample soil for analysts of total lead <br /> This was completed during this assessment at the request of the SJCEHD since prior soil <br /> sampling and analyses did not include analysis of lead At these locations, a soil sample was <br /> collected from the borings at 14 feet bgs, a depth directly beneath the former UST Soil lithology <br /> was not logged during the January 2001 assessment but is similar to the subsurface lithology <br /> logged during ESA's initial assessment in July 2000 These boring logs are attached to this report <br /> as Appendix B <br /> ESA field personnel did not detect petroleum odors or hydrocarbon sheen on the water samples <br /> Y p <br /> Table 3 summarizes the analytical results of petroleum compounds detected in soil and <br /> groundwater samples Three groundwater samples were analyzed for the presence of TPH as gas <br /> and BTEX by EPA Methods 8015 and 8020 Twelve groundwater samples were analyzed for the <br /> presence of MTBE,DIPE, TAME, ETBE, EDB, 1,2-Dichloroethane (1,2-DCA),TBA, ethanol, <br /> and methanol by EPA Method 8260 Laboratory analyses did not detect concentrations above the <br /> laboratory detection linuts for the constituents analyzed Analyses detected lead by EPA Method <br /> 6010 between 5 9 mg/kg and 8 8 mg/kg, which are indicative of naturally-occurring lead <br /> concentrations in soils and do not indicate contamination from the petroleum additive tetraethyl <br /> lead Laboratory analytical reports are provided in Appendix C <br /> IV. GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Following the review of the January 2001 groundwater assessment findings, in April 2001, the <br /> SJCEHD requested installation of three groundwater monitoring wells to establish groundwater <br /> flow direction In addition, SJCEHD requested that groundwater samples be collected and <br /> analyzed for MTBE for a minimum of four quarters The SJCEHD also noted that in order for <br /> this site to be considered for closure, groundwater samples must be collected from all wells and <br /> analyzed at least once for total TPH as gasoline, BTEX, five fuel oxygenates, and 1,2-DCE and _ - <br /> EDB-_ - <br /> ESA submitted the Groundwater Monitoring Well Installation Workplan to SJCEHD on <br /> September 27, 2001 for review Ms Dot Lofstrom of SJCEHD approved the workplan on <br /> October 1, 2001 The workplan addressed installation of four groundwater monitoring wells to <br /> deternune groundwater flow direction and to further delineate the lateral extent of MTBE <br /> t Groundwater Assessment Report 10 ESA/200252 <br /> September 2003 <br />