Laserfiche WebLink
Shnckey Truck•Stop - 6 - September 201'2, <br /> Claim No. 9384 <br /> ATTACHMENT 2 <br /> Historic Recommendations <br /> June 2008, free product is likely present in the vicinity of MW-1 and MW-4. The Fund <br /> recommends that the San Joaquin County LOP direct the Responsible Party to assess remedial <br /> techniques that will identify remaining sources of free phase petroleum and recover it to the <br /> extent feasible. The Fund will review this site next year to track progress. <br /> UPDATED, June 2009, the Responsible Party has proposed several remedial technologies to <br /> achieve Water Quality Objectives. The Fund recommends that a remedial plan be.select6d and <br /> active remediation should begin without delay. The Fund will review this site next year to track. <br /> progress. <br /> UPDATED, July 2010, the Responsible Party submitted a Soil Vapor Extraction Feasibility <br /> "Testing Work Plan on 12 July 2010. Since the principal contaminant of concern at this site is <br /> diesel fuel, which has relatively low volatility, the Fund questions the viability of soil vapor, <br /> extraction and recommends that the San Joaquin County LOP direct the Responsible Party to <br /> select an-alternate remedial technology.--The Fund-will review this site next year-to track. F <br /> progress. <br /> UPDATED, August 2011, the Fund recommends that the San Joaquin County LOP direct the <br /> Responsible Party to begin active remediation by a technology proven to reduce the mass of <br /> ;heavy hydrocarbons (TPHd). <br /> . t <br />