Laserfiche WebLink
• 20 August 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0185 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> Free product was encountered in well MW-4. The amount of free product recovered in the bailer <br /> p <br /> during purging increased from a thickness of approximately '/2 inch at the initial bail to 10 inches at <br /> ' the final bail <br /> 2.2. COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> ' Ground water samples were collected from each monitoring well using the dedicated disposable <br /> plastic bailers. Each water sample was then transferred into three 40-m1 volatile organic analysis <br /> (VOA) vials containing 0.5 m] 18% HCl as a sample preservative one 1-liter amber bottle and one <br /> ' I-liter amber bottle without preservative. The samples were then labeled and placed in a chilled <br /> container for transport under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical, Inc. (MAI), a California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory. <br /> All water samples were analyzed for: <br /> ' . a Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified and <br /> Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylene (BTEX) and methyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> ' (MTBE) in accordance with EPA Method 8020. <br /> The oxygenated compounds di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> ' methyl tertiary-butyl ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl' ether (TAME), tertiary butanol <br /> (TBA) in accordance with EPA Method 8250 Modified. <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br />' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected on <br /> 21 June 2002, the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water sample <br />' laboratory analytical data. <br /> 3.1. GROUND WATER GRADIENT AND FLOW DIRECTION <br /> During the June 2002 sampling event,the depth to ground water ranged fi-om 23.1.6 to 24.54 feet bsg. <br />' The depth to ground water data collected from well MW-4 appears to affected by the presence of <br /> • free-product. The thickness of the product was not measurable to recalculate a relative ground water <br /> elevation, therefore the relative ground water elevation from well MW-4-was discounted when . <br />' preparing the ground water"gradient map: <br /> S <br />' Advanced Geo EnvironmentaL Inc. <br />