Laserfiche WebLink
' 08 November 2004 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0432 <br />' Page 2 of 4 <br />' monitoring wells MW-1 through MW-8, a minimum of three casing water volumes per well <br /> Temperature, pH, and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular purge-volume <br /> intervals using an Oakton water analyzer Monitoring well field logs are included in Appendix A <br /> Purge water generated from the monitoring wells was contained on-site in appropriately labeled 55- <br /> gallon drums <br />' 22 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br />' Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells using the disposable polyethylene <br /> bailers, these bailers are disposed of after one use and require no decontamination, thereby <br /> minimizing cross-contamination from sampling devices Each water sample was transferred into <br />' three 40-milliliter (ml) EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml <br /> 18% hydrochloric acid solution as a sample preservative, and into one 1-liter amber bottle without <br /> preservative After collection, the samples were labeled and placed in a chilled container for <br />' transportation under chain of custody to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories(CTEL),a California <br /> Department of Health Services (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory located in Paramount, <br /> California Each sample was analyzed for <br />' • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d, <br /> respectively) in accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, and <br /> 1 • Benzene,toluene,ethylbenzenc, and total xylenes(BTEX)and fuel additive compounds di- <br /> isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), methyl tertiary-butyl ether <br /> ' (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), tertiary butanol (TBA), 1,2-dichloroethane <br /> (1,2-DCA), and 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB), in accordance with EPA Method 8260B <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction, and gradient were determined from field data collected in <br /> October 2004,the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water sample <br /> ' laboratory analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT - <br /> The depth to ground water measured in the monitoring wells ranged from 16 70 feet to 18 65 feet <br /> below the tops of the well casings (Table 1) The ground water elevation at the site ranged from <br /> 18 55 feet (MW-7) to 19 91 feet (MWN above mean sea level (MSL), the average ground water <br /> elevation increased approximately 2 feet since the previous monitoring event in July 2004 The <br /> 1 � <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />