My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005008
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MONTE DIABLO
>
1766
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0535112
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2020 12:37:03 AM
Creation date
3/17/2020 2:49:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005008
RECORD_ID
PR0535112
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0020296
FACILITY_NAME
CHAPIN BROTHERS INC
STREET_NUMBER
1766
STREET_NAME
MONTE DIABLO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13505050
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1766 MONTE DIABLO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� v <br /> . A S S O C t A T E S I N C <br /> remaining pollutants in groundwater do not create or threaten to create risk to human <br /> health or safety — tjc,c , (ZPcA 4A 44A +, NZ<J,;, w,K so,( eft uSt.1, <br /> The City of Stockton operated a municipal well approximately 1,200 feet downgradient <br /> from the site until the late 1970s when it was shut down because of its brackish and salty <br /> content due to its proximity to the Stockton Deep Water Channel ATC contacted Cal <br /> Water, the entity that supplies drinking water and operates the municipal supply wells for <br /> ' the area of the site Mr Eric Mar, Field Supervisor, said that the water quality in the area <br /> of the site is very poor, due to inorganic pollutants from the Stockton Deep Water <br /> Channel (nitrates, sulfates, salinity, etc ), and that no future supply wells are planned for <br /> that area at this time Because the overall water quality of the basin is poor and no <br /> beneficial future use of the basin is planned by the local water provider, the II-year <br /> estimate of the MT31) model for contaminants reaching near MCLs in 2015 is acceptable <br /> ' —r2-1.7A"� f"� ts-s"-, fir ' e)""1+ "&,fly WJ ¢afL �luK IC rAlj o�5w,o <br /> Criterion G. The plume is stable and sufficiently limited in lateral and vertical extent and <br /> contaminant concentrations detected in groundwater show a decreasing <br /> ' trend with time One hydrologic cycle (four quarters) of monitoring after <br /> active remediation measures have ceased is usually considered to be the <br /> minimum necessary to determine site groundwater and plume conditions. <br /> The plume has been defined vertically and laterally since 1998 The MT313 model <br /> (u�shows that hydrocarbon contaminant concentrations will drop significantly for the first -0—f-7 <br /> three years followed by constant levels as the plume stabilizes It should be noted that _�,kwkt s•T <br /> laboratory analytical data from historical groundwater monitoring events shows that the -tit delre«<�e <br /> plume is decreasing in size and TPHg concentrations are decreasing more rapidly than ` W"7 sf <br /> ' predicted by the MT31) model This MT31) model simulation represents a very <br /> conservative estimation since the extents of the soil contaminant source 4 rbased on <br /> laboratory analytical collected in 1995 prior to the startup of soil vapor extraction <br /> 17V1 <br /> system Based on the results of the model, it is ATC's opinion that one hydrologic <br /> cycle of monitoring after active remediation measures have ceased is not necessary and <br /> ' the site should be immediately be granted NFA <br /> 7.2 Appendix A Check List <br /> ' Appendix A of the Tri-Regional Board's recommendations checklist of required data for site <br /> closure of USTs has been completed, as appropriate The checklist is included in this report as <br /> ' Appendix A <br /> 8.0 CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS <br /> ' The best available technology, vapor extraction, air sparge, groundwater extraction, and soil <br /> excavation and disposal, were used to remediate impacted soil and groundwater at the site <br /> Findings of our evaluation concluded that the project site does not appear to represent a <br /> W 1271421reportslclosure doc 22 <br />) 1 <br /> N <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.