Laserfiche WebLink
i . 5 1 1 Soil Sampling <br /> Soil samples were collected at approximate 5-foot intervals in the borings using a California-modified <br /> split spoon sampler containing three clean stainless steel sleeves The sampler and sample sleeves <br /> were washed with laboratory soap and rinsed with clean water prior to each sampling event <br /> Following sample collection, the open ends of the lower sleeve were covered with plastic end caps <br /> and made airtight with duct tape This sleeve was labeled with SEACOR project and sample <br /> identification numbers and the date, and placed in iced storage Approximately one-half the contents <br /> of the middle sleeve was placed in a sealable plastic bag, after 3 to 4 minutes, the probe of an organic <br /> vapor meter (OVM) was inserted into the bag and the meter reading in ppm was recorded on the <br /> boring log (Appendix A) The remaining contents of the middle sleeve were used for descriptive <br /> purposes, which were also recorded on the log of the borings (Appendix A) Soils encountered in <br /> the borings were described and classified using the Unified Soil Classification System (Figure A-1) <br /> Contents of the upper sleeve were regarded as sluff material and were added to the drill cuttings <br /> Contaminated drill cuttings were placed in Department of Transportation (DOT)-approved 17-H <br /> drums and left at the site in a fenced and locked storage yard <br /> 5 1 2 Laboratory Analyses and Results <br /> Soil samples were selected for laboratory analysis based on OVM readings and proximity to the <br /> groundwater surface The samples were listed on a chain of custody record (Appendix B) and <br /> . transported directly to the laboratory for analysis Selected samples were analyzed for TPHg using <br /> Environmental Protection Agency(EPA)method 8015 (modified), and for BTEX using EPA method <br /> 8020 by Matrix Environmental Laboratories, Inc of Rancho Cordova, California, a state-certified <br /> environmental laboratory for these analyses <br /> The results of the laboratory analyses indicated that contamination is present at 21 feet below ground <br /> surface onsite and offsite to the west No soil contamination was detected in the sample collected <br /> from B2 north of the site, across Monte Diablo Avenue (Table 3) A sample collected from <br /> approximately 31 feet below ground surface in a contaminated soil boring (133) indicated that <br /> contamination had not migrated downward into the medium gray silty clay encountered beneath the <br /> groundwater-bearing zone Soil samples collected from soil borings B4 and B5 located onsite were <br /> found to contain the highest concentrations of TPHg and BTEX (Table 3) <br /> SEACOR 014-01-1 par <br /> 6 <br />