Laserfiche WebLink
I - <br /> presented in this report were remeasured two days later in the office and therefore, may not represent <br /> an accurate measure of actual field concentrations The remaining contents of the middle sleeve was <br /> used for descriptive purposes, which were recorded on the log of the borings (Appendix A) <br /> Contents of the upper sleeve was regarded as sluff material and was added to the drill cuttings <br /> Contaminated drill cuttings were placed in Department of Transportation (DOT)-approved 17-H <br /> drums and left at the site in a fenced and locked storage yard <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from each boring (with the exception of 137) by advancing the <br /> augers 1 to 2 feet past the surface of the groundwater, and inserting a steam-cleaned, stainless steel <br /> well point casing through the hollow stem augers Approximately 2 to 3 gallons of water were hand <br /> bailed from the well point casing prior to sampling the boring Groundwater was retrieved using the <br /> plastic hand bailer, and was then transferred to laboratory-sterilized, 40-milliliter glass containers <br /> The glass containers were labeled and place in iced storage for delivery to the environmental <br /> laboratory These samples were submitted to Matrix Environmental Laboratories, Inc under strict <br /> chain of custody (Appendix D) <br /> 5 3 3 Laboratory Analyses and Results <br /> Laboratory analytical data of a groundwater sample collected in this manner is not generally accepted <br /> by state and local regulatory agencies as an accurate representation of formation water conditions <br /> This approach however, was very cost-effective in plume delineation because it reduced the number <br /> of monitor wells necessary to fully delineate the plume Results of the laboratory analyses from the <br /> well point and monitor well samples were used to construct an iso--concentration map of benzene <br /> concentrations detected in groundwater beneath the area(Figure 7) <br /> The soil and ground water samples were analyzed for TPHg and BTEX using EPA methods 8015 <br /> modified/5030 and EPA method 8020 (602 for water), respectively Results of these laboratory <br /> analyses indicated that soil was contaminated only in soil borings B6 and B7 and groundwater was <br /> contaminated only in boring B6 (Table 7) Laboratory reports for these samples are presented in <br /> Appendix D <br /> SEACOR 014-01-1 par 13 <br /> D <br />