Laserfiche WebLink
Appendix E <br /> SOIL BORING PROGRAM <br /> ' Golden Grain Company <br /> 299 Moffat Boulevard <br /> Manteca,California <br /> ' In November 1995, Fluor Daniel GTI,on behalf of Golden Grain Company,prepared a Work Plan for <br /> Implementation of a Soil Boring Program The purpose of the soil boring program was to evaluate the <br /> ' overall effectiveness of the remediation system,define the extent of impacted groundwater,determine the <br /> concentrations of soil and groundwater contamination,if any,that exist under the former warehouse, and to <br /> collect soil samples for further definition of the aquifer characteristics The work plan was submitted to <br /> ' Golden Grain on November 16, 1995 The work plan was subsequently submitted to the San Joaquin <br /> County Environmental Health Department(SJCEHD) and approved with modifications On January 25, <br /> 1996, Fluor Daniel GTI submitted an addendum to the work plan addressing the requested modifications <br /> ' The field work outlined in the work plan and addendum was completed in April 1996 The following <br /> describes the methodology,work performed,and results of the soil boring program <br /> ' METHODOLOGY <br /> Site-Spec>fc Health and Safety Plan. The Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan was amended and <br /> ' updated to address the proposed work scope All Fluor Daniel GTI personnel and subcontractors were <br /> required to review and sign the Health and Safety Plan prior to performing any work at the site <br /> Permitting. Permit applications were submitted to and permits obtained from the SJCEHD for the soil <br /> borings and temporary monitoring points <br /> ' Subsurface Assessment-Soil. In April 1996,ten soil borings were advanced at the site using GeoProbe <br /> direct push technology The sod bonngs were continuously logged at each coring location, using the <br /> Unified Soil Classification System, by a Fluor Daniel GTI field geologist working under the supervision of a <br /> ' California registered geologist During the soil conng and sampling procedures, all equipment was <br /> decontaminated to avoid any potential cross contamination <br /> ' The continuous cores were screened for hydrocarbon vapors using a photo-ionization detector(PID) <br /> Screening was conducted by field headspace analysis on selected sections of sal cores A soil sample <br /> was placed in a zip-lock bag fora minimum of five minutes before the PID probe was inserted and the <br /> ' reading recorded <br /> Soil bonngs C1 through C7 were advanced and samples collected to determine if the soil vapor extraction <br /> ' system (SUES) had been effective in remediating subsurface vadose zone soil Soil samples were also <br /> collected from bonngs C2,C6,and C8 for aquifer parameter testing In addition, boring C6 was advanced <br /> to 36 feet below grade to determine the vertical extent of impacted soil adjacent to the former tank pit area <br /> ' Soil boring locations are shown in Figure 3 <br /> ' Soil samples were collected for laboratory analysis from the cares based on Irthologic changes, proximity to <br /> the water table,field screening results, and depth below the water table The samples were placed in brass <br /> tubes,the ends of the brass tubes were sealed with Teflon sheets, capped with plastic caps,taped, labeled, <br /> ' and placed on ice in an insulated container chilled to 4°C The samples were maintained and transported <br /> FLUOR DANIEL G!1 4 <br /> ' .wap - <br />