Laserfiche WebLink
simulation time 10 years <br /> Grid size 20 x 30 <br /> ' Cell size 50 ft x 50 ft <br /> Porosity 0 3 <br /> Longitudinal Dispersivity 10 ft <br /> Transverse Dispersivity 3 ft <br /> ' Txx 0025 ft'-/s <br /> Tyy 0025 ft2/s <br /> Aquifer thickness 25 ft <br /> Hydraulic Gradient 4 29E-3 ft/ft <br /> Injection well at cell X=10,Y=10 <br /> Injection rate 0 0002 cfs <br /> Conc of contaminant in injected water 150 mg/l <br /> Conc of oxygen in injected water 0 0 mg/l <br /> ' Initial Conc of oxygen 8 0 mg/l <br /> Conc of natural recharge of oxygen B 0 mg/l <br /> A detailed discussion of the sensitivity analyses is included in thefollowng sections <br /> ' 2 3.1 Variation of Concentrations with Hydraulic Conductivity <br /> The hydraulic conductivity(K)was vaned from 10-'ft/sec to 1 a'ft/sec Figure 2 3 is a plot of the <br /> contaminant and oxygen concentrations along the centerline of the plume(cross section A-A, Figure 2 2) <br /> for three values of hydraulic conductivity It can be seen that the hydraulic conductivity has a significant <br /> effect on biodegradation The maximum contanvnant concentration vaned from 29 6 mgh(K= 104 ft/sec) <br /> to 130 mg/1(K= 10-' ft(sec) The change in biodegraded mass with hydraulic conductivity is illustrated in <br /> Figure 2 4 <br /> 2 3 2 Variation of Concentrations with Retardation <br /> The effect of retardation on biodegradation was studied by using a retardation factor, R,greater than <br /> 1 Figure 2 5 presents the variation in contaminant and oxygen concentrations along the centerline of the <br /> plume (section A-A, Figure 2 2)for three values of R It can be seen that the mass of hydrocarbon <br /> ' remaining at the end of the simulation period decreases with increasing values of R The percent of mass <br /> biodegraded relative to the total dissolved mass, however,decreases for increasing values of R(Figure <br /> 2 4b) <br /> ' Table 2 1 lists the percent of mass biodegraded relative to the total dissolved mass and the percent <br /> of mass biodegraded relative to the total stored mass Table 2 1 also lists the percent of mass adsorbed <br /> relative to the total stored mass for the three values of R Table 21 indicates that the percent of <br /> biodegraded mass decreases with increasing values of retardation (columns A and B) <br /> Table 2 1 -Percent Biodegraded Mass as a Function of the Retardation Factor(R) <br /> R A B C <br /> 1 3025 3025 000 <br /> 2 2773 1386 5000 <br /> 3 2574 858 6667 <br /> A= BMITDM BM = Biodegraded Mass <br /> B= BMITSM AM =Adsorbed Mass <br /> C=AM/TSM TDM = Dissolved Mass+ Biodegraded Mass <br /> TSM = Dissolved Mass+ Biodegraded Mass+Adsorbed Mass <br /> 2 3 3 Vanation of Concentrations with Dispersivity <br /> eThe vanabon of contaminant concentrations with dispersivity was examined by loolung at the <br /> longitudinal and transverse dispersivities independently <br /> r 2-4 I <br />