Laserfiche WebLink
.3_ � <br /> ' No Further Arbon Procedure a janu,�ry 594E <br /> With all or part of 2411A counties and eight LOP counties in Region 5,staff has striven <br /> for consistency in the site closure process. To better respond to the guidance in the <br /> 8 December memo,the three offices in the Central Valley are prepared to: <br /> ' 1. Develop a list of soil-only cases for letters to be sent to the site owner, <br /> 2. Send a letter notifying those(soil-only case)site owners to prepare the <br /> documentation for their site closure, <br /> 1 3. Assign all soil only cases in the LIA counties to the Board[]T Lhut <br /> Closure staff(LIAs will comtinue closures for tank pulls And"scoop <br /> and runs"), <br /> I <br /> 4. Send letters to tank owners with sites that are listed as <br /> "undeternuned"in the LUS17S database,tnformidg them that they <br /> 1 may be elfgibte for site closure,when the site is characterized, <br /> 5 Concentrate enforcement UT staff(non-closure staff)efforts to resolve <br /> ground water impacted sites,including those currently in 1AP <br /> counties;and <br /> 6. Direct IAP counties to work to close their soil-only sites <br /> On 11 and 12 January 1996.Regional$tend staffs <br /> will meet to discuss the expedited <br /> closure procedure described in tate 8 December memo. Staff of the Central,Valley <br /> presents the above information for your consideration and discussion at thattu coon m <br /> e to <br /> perhaps reach a consensus on the criteria and process for ccpedi $ <br /> no requests. We are confident that an open exchange of ideas will provide consistency on <br /> 1 how the process can be implemented in the best interests of the public. <br /> Enclosum <br /> cc Mr.John Noonan,Fresno Office <br /> Ms.Karen Clementsen,Redding Office <br /> Mr.James G.Gimmopoulos,Clean Water Programs,SWRCB <br /> I1 <br /> 1 � <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 1 � <br />