Laserfiche WebLink
14 January 2004 <br /> . AGE-NC Project No.,98=0520 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> properly labeled, placed in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to Cal Tech <br /> ' Environmental Laboratories (CTEL), a, California Department of Health Services,(DHS)-certified <br /> analytical laboratory, for analysis. The samples were analyzed for: <br /> ' Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA , <br /> Method 8015M; and <br /> ' Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX),and fuel additives, including methyl <br /> tertiary- butyl,ether(MTBE), tertiary butanol (TBA), di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tert- <br /> butyl ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) and <br /> 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B. <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> Ground water elevation and,flow direction were determined from field.data collected on 27 August <br /> 2003. Hydrocarbon-impact to ground water was quantified from laboratory analysis of the ground•. <br /> water samples. ; <br /> 3.L GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> ' The elevation of ground water in each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to ground water <br /> from the surveyed casing elevations (Table 1). Depths, to ground water ranged from 23.75 feet <br /> ' (MW-7) to 24.95 feet {MW-6) below the tops of the well casings (btoc). Ground water elevations <br /> at the site (not including MW-6) averaged approximately 12.21 feet above mean sea level (MSL) <br /> showing an elevation decrease of approximately 2.11 feet since the last monitoring event. <br /> The ground water flow direction was determined using ground water elevation data from water table <br /> wells MW-3 through MW-5 and MW-7 through MW-10. Elevation data from well MW-6was not - <br /> utilized because well MW-6 is a deep-screen well. The groundwater table underlying the'site forms <br /> anorthwest trending trough wh ich flows into a slight depression northwest of the site;the net ground <br /> water flow is toward the northwest under an average gradient of 0.002 foot/foot. Figure 3 illustrates <br /> ' the contoured ground water elevations as measured on 27 August 2003. <br />' 3.2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES ; <br />' TPH-g was detected in the water samples collected from wells MW-3 and-MW-5, at concentrations <br /> of 870 micrograms per liter(erg/l) and 1,000 lrg/l, respectively.Figure 4 illustrates the approximate <br /> distribution of dissolved TPH-g. <br />' Advanced CeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />