My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005089
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
757
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545572
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2020 2:05:04 AM
Creation date
3/18/2020 4:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005089
RECORD_ID
PR0545572
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006855
FACILITY_NAME
ECKERT COLD STORAGE COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
757
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95366
APN
22104041
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
757 MOFFAT BLVD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Background Information <br /> Eckert Cold Storage,Manteca,CA <br /> February 27,2006 <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br /> Condor conducted the second quarter 2005 groundwater monitoring event at the site on July 8, 2005 <br /> Monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-8 were sampled during the second quarter As mentioned above, <br /> Condor had recommended quarterly monitoring of MW-5 along with MW-4 and MW-8 in the First <br /> Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report After reviewing Condor's recommendation, Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> of the SJCEHD verbally requested quarterly monitoring of MW-5 and MW-8 provided that Site <br /> monitoring wells MW-I and MW-4 are sampled on annual basis in the fourth quarter (December) <br /> No separate phase petroleum or sheen was noted in the wells during the July 8, 2005 monitoring event, <br /> but a moderate hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater inspection sample collected from MW-8 <br /> Water levels were collected from all eight of the site monitoring wells on July 8, 2005 The average <br /> groundwater elevation was approximately 2 04 feet lower than the previous sampling event conducted on <br /> March 9, 2005 The groundwater gradient estimated with a three-point construction using wells MW-3, <br /> MW-4, and MW-6 was approximately 0 0011 ft/ft toward the west Historically, the groundwater gradient <br /> direction at the site has been variable but generally to the northwest During the previous quarter (March <br /> 9, 2005), the groundwater gradient direction (northwest) was consistent with the predominant historic <br /> gradient direction This represented a shift back from the two previous quarterly monitoring events which <br /> indicated a northerly flow (December 2004) and a northeasterly flow (September 2004) The gradient <br /> direction estimated during the second quarter monitoring event (west on July 8, 2005) was not consistent <br /> with recent historic gradient directions The estimated gradient magnitude (0 0011 fuft), however, <br /> indicated a very gentle water table slope, consequently the flow direction may not be significant relative <br /> to transport of site groundwater contamination <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells were analyzed for BTEX, TPH-G, and <br /> selected gasoline oxygenates/additives including MTBE As mentioned above, prior to the December <br /> 2004 monitoring event, historic laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples collected from MW- <br /> 5 indicated generally very low contaminant concentrations Laboratory analytical results of samples <br /> collected from MW-5 in December 2004, January 2005, and March 2005, however, indicated higher <br /> contaminant concentrations (but with a decreasing trend in contaminant concentrations) Laboratory <br /> analytical results collected from MW-5 during the July 8, 2005 monitoring event indicated that the trend <br /> was continuing — contaminant concentrations had returned to very low levels Conversely, prior to the <br /> December 2004 monitoring event, historic laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples collected <br /> from MW-8 indicated generally elevated contaminant concentrations Laboratory analytical results of <br /> samples collected from MW-8 in December 2004, January 2005, and March 9, 2005 indicated lower <br /> contaminant concentrations relative to the historic results The laboratory analytical results collected from <br /> MW-8 during the July 2005 monitoring event indicated that contaminants in MW-8 had returned to the <br /> relatively higher concentrations consistent with samples from the well collected prior to December 2004 <br /> Condor conducted third quarter 2005 groundwater monitoring activities on September 22, 2005 <br /> Monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-8 were sampled during the third quarter As mentioned above, Condor <br /> had recommended quarterly monitoring of MW-5 along with MW-4 and MW-8 in the First Quarter <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report After reviewing Condor's recommendation, Mr Harlin Knoll of the <br /> SJCEHD verbally requested quarterly monitoring of MW-5 and MW-8 provided that Site monitoring <br /> wells MW-1 and MW-4 are sampled on annual basis in the fourth quarter(December) <br /> No separate phase petroleum or sheen was noted in the inspection sample collected from wells during the <br /> third quarter monitoring event, but a moderate hydrocarbon odor was noted in the inspection samples <br /> collected from both Water levels were collected from all eight of the site monitoring wells on September <br /> 22, 2005 The average groundwater elevation was approximately 0 34 foot lower than the previous <br /> • sampling event conducted on July 8, 2005 The groundwater gradient estimated with a three-point <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.