Laserfiche WebLink
Site Background Information <br /> Eckert Cold Storage,Manteca,CA <br /> February 27,2006 <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br /> Condor conducted the second quarter 2005 groundwater monitoring event at the site on July 8, 2005 <br /> Monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-8 were sampled during the second quarter As mentioned above, <br /> Condor had recommended quarterly monitoring of MW-5 along with MW-4 and MW-8 in the First <br /> Quarter Groundwater Monitoring Report After reviewing Condor's recommendation, Mr Harlin Knoll <br /> of the SJCEHD verbally requested quarterly monitoring of MW-5 and MW-8 provided that Site <br /> monitoring wells MW-I and MW-4 are sampled on annual basis in the fourth quarter (December) <br /> No separate phase petroleum or sheen was noted in the wells during the July 8, 2005 monitoring event, <br /> but a moderate hydrocarbon odor was noted in the groundwater inspection sample collected from MW-8 <br /> Water levels were collected from all eight of the site monitoring wells on July 8, 2005 The average <br /> groundwater elevation was approximately 2 04 feet lower than the previous sampling event conducted on <br /> March 9, 2005 The groundwater gradient estimated with a three-point construction using wells MW-3, <br /> MW-4, and MW-6 was approximately 0 0011 ft/ft toward the west Historically, the groundwater gradient <br /> direction at the site has been variable but generally to the northwest During the previous quarter (March <br /> 9, 2005), the groundwater gradient direction (northwest) was consistent with the predominant historic <br /> gradient direction This represented a shift back from the two previous quarterly monitoring events which <br /> indicated a northerly flow (December 2004) and a northeasterly flow (September 2004) The gradient <br /> direction estimated during the second quarter monitoring event (west on July 8, 2005) was not consistent <br /> with recent historic gradient directions The estimated gradient magnitude (0 0011 fuft), however, <br /> indicated a very gentle water table slope, consequently the flow direction may not be significant relative <br /> to transport of site groundwater contamination <br /> The groundwater samples collected from the monitoring wells were analyzed for BTEX, TPH-G, and <br /> selected gasoline oxygenates/additives including MTBE As mentioned above, prior to the December <br /> 2004 monitoring event, historic laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples collected from MW- <br /> 5 indicated generally very low contaminant concentrations Laboratory analytical results of samples <br /> collected from MW-5 in December 2004, January 2005, and March 2005, however, indicated higher <br /> contaminant concentrations (but with a decreasing trend in contaminant concentrations) Laboratory <br /> analytical results collected from MW-5 during the July 8, 2005 monitoring event indicated that the trend <br /> was continuing — contaminant concentrations had returned to very low levels Conversely, prior to the <br /> December 2004 monitoring event, historic laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples collected <br /> from MW-8 indicated generally elevated contaminant concentrations Laboratory analytical results of <br /> samples collected from MW-8 in December 2004, January 2005, and March 9, 2005 indicated lower <br /> contaminant concentrations relative to the historic results The laboratory analytical results collected from <br /> MW-8 during the July 2005 monitoring event indicated that contaminants in MW-8 had returned to the <br /> relatively higher concentrations consistent with samples from the well collected prior to December 2004 <br /> Condor conducted third quarter 2005 groundwater monitoring activities on September 22, 2005 <br /> Monitoring wells MW-5 and MW-8 were sampled during the third quarter As mentioned above, Condor <br /> had recommended quarterly monitoring of MW-5 along with MW-4 and MW-8 in the First Quarter <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report After reviewing Condor's recommendation, Mr Harlin Knoll of the <br /> SJCEHD verbally requested quarterly monitoring of MW-5 and MW-8 provided that Site monitoring <br /> wells MW-1 and MW-4 are sampled on annual basis in the fourth quarter(December) <br /> No separate phase petroleum or sheen was noted in the inspection sample collected from wells during the <br /> third quarter monitoring event, but a moderate hydrocarbon odor was noted in the inspection samples <br /> collected from both Water levels were collected from all eight of the site monitoring wells on September <br /> 22, 2005 The average groundwater elevation was approximately 0 34 foot lower than the previous <br /> • sampling event conducted on July 8, 2005 The groundwater gradient estimated with a three-point <br />