My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005089
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
757
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545572
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005089
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2020 2:05:04 AM
Creation date
3/18/2020 4:44:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005089
RECORD_ID
PR0545572
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0006855
FACILITY_NAME
ECKERT COLD STORAGE COMPANY
STREET_NUMBER
757
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95366
APN
22104041
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
757 MOFFAT BLVD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Fourth Quarter 2005 Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Eckert Cold Storage,Manteca,California <br /> February 27,2006 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Table 1–Groundwater Elevation Data ( <br /> January 5,2006) <br /> Monitoring Screened Interval(bgs) TOC Elevationi Depth to Water Groundwater <br /> Well <br /> Elevation <br /> MW-1 13-28 <br /> 3809 1601 2208 <br /> MW-2 15-30 3790 1568 2222 <br /> MW-3 15-30 3831 — 1621 22 10 <br /> MW-4 12-27 3784 16 11 21 73 <br /> MW-5 14-34 4122 1935 2187 <br /> MW-6 13-33 3765 1544 2221 <br /> MW-7 13-33 3822 1607 2215 <br /> MW-8 17-37 377 1559 22 17 <br /> 'TOC Elevation Elevations are measured from the top of the well casing and are referenced to NGS Benchmark HS4486,elevation 35 03 <br /> feet using NAVA 88 datum <br /> All measurements are in feet <br /> Histoncally, the groundwater gradient direction at the Site has been vanable but generally to the <br /> northwest The current groundwater gradient direction (northwest at a magnitude of 0 0029 ft/ft) is <br /> therefore generally consistent with historic gradient directions <br /> LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> . The groundwater samples collected on January 5, 2006 from monitoring wells MW-4,MW-5,MW-7, and <br /> MW-8 were analyzed for benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and total xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Method <br /> 8260B, total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-G) by EPA Method 8015M, and <br /> selected gasoline oxygenates/additives including methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) by EPA Method <br /> 8260B The current analytical results are shown in Table 2, on the next page <br /> Prior to the December 2004 monitoring event, historic laboratory analytical results of groundwater <br /> samples collected from MW-5 indicated generally very low contaminant concentrations Laboratory <br /> analytical results of samples collected from MW-5 in December 2004, January 2005, and March 2005 <br /> indicated higher contaminant concentrations (but with a decreasing trend in contaminant concentrations) <br /> Laboratory analytical results of groundwater samples collected from monitor well MW-5 during the July <br /> 2005 monitoring event indicated that contaminant concentrations had returned to very low levels The <br /> Previous (September 2005) and current laboratory analytical results indicate that these very low levels <br /> have continued(see historic groundwater monitoring data, Attachment C) <br /> Conversely, prior to the December 2004 monitoring event, historic laboratory analytical results of <br /> groundwater samples collected from MW-8 indicated generally elevated contaminant concentrations <br /> Laboratory analytical results of samples collected from MW-8 in December 2004, January 2005, and <br /> March 2005 indicated lower contaminant concentrations relative to the histone results Laboratory <br /> analytical results from the July 2005 monitor event indicated that contaminants in MW-8 had <br /> increased back to the relatively higher concentrations consistent with samples from the well collected <br /> prior to December 2004 Previous (September 2005) contaminant concentrations detected in MW-8 <br /> indicated that contaminant concentrations had returned to the low levels relative to historic results, and <br /> the current laboratory analytical results indicate that these very low levels have continued (see histone <br /> • groundwater monitoring data,Attachment C) <br /> } <br /> tM <br /> to <br /> CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.