Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> Rea DEC 7 - 2000 _- <br /> 2 JEANNE MILLSAPS <br /> CLERK <br /> 4 $DEPUTY <br /> 5 <br /> 6 <br /> 7 <br /> 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN <br /> 9 THE PEOPLE OF THE STA'T'E OF ) No. CV007544 <br /> ALIFORNIA,Ex rel. CENTRAL VALLEY ) <br /> 10 REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL <br /> BOARD and DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC ) STATEMENT OF DECISION <br /> 11 SUBSTANCES CONTROL, AND JUDGMENT <br /> [C.C.P. §632; California <br /> 12 Plaintiffs, ) Rules of Court,Rule 2321 <br /> 13 vs. <br /> 14 BRUCE HIMBROUGH,JOANNE M. ) <br /> KEABROUGH,JOE J.MACHADO and ) <br /> • 15 LILLIAN E.MACHADO, ) <br /> 16 Defendants. <br /> 17 <br /> 18 The above entitled case came on regularly for Court Trial on March 21,2000 at 10:00 m. in <br /> 19 Department 42 of the Superior Court. Deputy Attorney General WILLIAM N.BRIEGER and Deputy <br /> 20 District Attorney DAVID J. I REY appeared on and behalf of the plaintiffs, People of the State of <br /> 21 California. Attorney EDGAR HAYDEN, JR., appeared on and behalf of their Defendants, OE J. <br /> 22 MACHADO,LILLIAN E.MACHADO,BRUCE KIMBROUGH, and JOANNE KEABROU H. <br /> 23 Pre-trial Briefs were submitted and reviewed. A site visit was conducted on the first day of trial. <br /> 24 Testimony from more than two dozen witnesses,documentary evidence,argument and post-trial briefs <br /> 25 were presented. The matter was taken under submission and the Court having considered the evidence, <br /> 26 argument and briefs issued the Court's Tentative Decision on September 6, 2000. <br /> 27 Upon the Defendant's September 15, 2000 request, the Court now issues this Statement of <br /> 28 Decision pursuant to Rule 232. This Statement of Decision takes into consideration all the p-oint s raised <br /> 1 <br />