Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> t <br /> 28 April 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No-99-0570 <br /> Page 2 of 6 s <br /> a , <br /> and Greig, J , 1986) and displayed the interpreted lithologies on a continuous CPT bonng'log The <br /> CPT interpretive logs are presented in Appendix A f <br /> Rmseate generated during drilling activities was containenzed in properly labeled DOT-approved <br /> 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site to an area lacking public access The CPT soil bonngs were <br /> backfilled over their entire depth range with a bentonite/portland cement grout mix <br /> 2 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLE COLLECTION <br /> IGrab ground water samples were collected In a twin soil boring advanced immediately adjacent to <br /> the initial CPT boring The samples were collected utilizing the 25-ton truck-mounted CPT drill rig <br /> equipped with 1 75-inch diameter hollow-stem rods fitted with a HydroPunch ground water sampling <br /> assembly, which was pushed to specified sampling depths in each soil boring Diagrams of the <br /> sampling assemblies are illustrated in Appendix A <br />' r <br /> Ground water samples were collected from specified depth intervals (zones)based on the acquired <br /> ICPT-llthology data indicating favorable conditions for sampling A HydroPunch sampling tool was <br /> . pushed into the specified zone,then withdrawn approximately five feet to expose an inlet screen,the <br /> Interior of the sampling tool filled with water and a 1-inch outer diameter(O D )stainless steel bailer <br /> Was lowered and utilized to extract a ground water sample <br /> Ground water samples were collected from CPT boring locations at the following intervals <br /> I • CPT-1 was sampled between 55 feet and 60 feet bsg and between 80 feet and 84 feet bsg, <br /> • CPT-2 was sampled between 55 feet and 60 feet bsg, between 89 feet and 94 feet bsg and <br /> Ibetween 110 feet and 114 feet bsg, and <br /> • CPT-3 was sampled between 55 feet and 60 feet bsg, between 85 feet and 90 feet bsg and <br /> between 110 feet and 114 feet bsg <br /> I Following sample collection, the samples were placed in laboratory-supplied containers, properly <br /> labeled and transported under chain-of-custody to McCampbell Analytical Inc (MAI), a State of <br /> California Department ofHealth Services(DHS)-certified laboratory All samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petro Icum,hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) and diesel (TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015-Modified, and <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and the fuel additives methyl <br /> tertiary-butyl ether MTBE, di-isopropyl ether (DIPE), ethyl tertiary-butyl ether (ETBE), <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvhronmental,Inc <br />