Laserfiche WebLink
1C <br /> a <br /> �r <br /> A S S D C I A T E S I N C <br />' layer was less pronounced and increased amounts of sand was encountered from approximately <br /> 54 to 63 feet bgs <br />' Soil in boring MW8 generally consisted of lean clay from the surface to depths between 6 5 to 10 <br /> feet bgs Soil consisted of poorly graded sand and silty sand from depths between 6 5 to 10 feet <br />' bgs and 16 5 to 20 feet bgs Soil consisted of lean clay and clayey sand from depths between <br /> 16 5 to 20 feet bgs and 26 5 to 30 feet bgs Soil consisted of elastic silt and silty sand from <br /> depths between 26 5 to 30 feet bgs and 36 5 to 40 feet bgs Soil consisted of lean clay from <br />' depths between 36 5 to 40 feet bgs and 46 5 to 50 feet bgs Soil consisted of silty sand and sandy <br /> silt from depths between 46 5 to 50 feet bgs and 61 5 to 65 feet bgs Soil consisted of lean clay <br /> from depths between 61 5 to 65 feet bgs and 71 to 75 feet bgs Soil consisted of elastic silt and <br /> silt from depths between 71 to 75 feet bgs and 86 5 to 95 feet bgs Soil consisted of silty sand <br /> from depths between 86 5 to 95 feet bgs and 101 feet bgs, the maximum depth explored Soil <br /> boring logs with a detailed description of soil types are contained in Appendix B <br /> 32 Hydromeology <br />' Water level measurements were collected from wells MW I through MW8 on December 14 <br /> 2000 Water levels ranged from 6100 to 62 36 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations <br /> in wells MWl through MW7 The water level data were used to develop the groundwater <br /> elevation contour map (Figure 3) The water level data from well MW8 was not used in the <br /> gradient calculations because it might not be screened in the same aquifer as the shallow wells <br /> There appears to be a mounding effect in well MW2 Assuming that horizontal isotropic <br /> conditions prevail, groundwater in the uppermost aquifer beneath the site flowed towards the <br /> northwest The average hydraulic gradient on December 14, 2000 was calculated to be 0 002 Rift <br />' or approximately 11 ft/mile A summary of groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 3 <br /> 4.0 ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> 441 Soil Analytical Results <br /> Soil samples collected from borings MW4 and MW5 contained no detectable concentrations of <br /> TPHg, BTEX, MTBE, TAME, ETBE, TBA, or DIPE Soil samples collected from boring MW6 <br /> contained elevated concentrations of TPHg and moderate concentrations of BTEX constituents <br /> The soil samples collected from boring MW6 contained no detectable concentrations of MTBE, <br /> TAME, ETBE, TBA, or DIPE Sol] samples collected from borings MW7 and MW8 contained <br /> nondetectable to moderate concentrations of TPHg and BTEX constituents The soil samples <br /> collected from borings MW7 and MW8 contained no detectable concentrations of MTBE, <br /> TAME, ETBE, TBA, or DIPE Analytical results of soil samples are summarized in Table 1 <br /> 1 <br /> w 1163931reportslsumn doe 5 <br />