Laserfiche WebLink
A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> and groundwater are impacted by petroleum hydrocarbons Site activities were summarized in <br /> ATC's Summary Report of Subsurface Investigation, dated January 15, 1999 <br /> SAMPLING ACTIVITIES <br /> On April 7, 1999, ATC personnel collected groundwater samples from monitoring wells MW1 <br /> through MW3 and the on-site groundwater supply well DW The locations of the wells are <br /> shown on Figure 2 Prior to collection of groundwater samples, the depth to water, pH, electrical <br /> conductivity, and temperature were measured in the monitoring wells and recorded A minimum <br /> of three well casing volumes were purged from each monitoring well prior to sampling The <br /> wells were allowed to recover and samples were collected from each well using dedicated <br /> disposable bailers The surge tank from supply well DW was purged for five minutes prior to <br /> sampling <br /> The groundwater samples collected from each well were submitted to State-certified Sequoia <br /> Analytical (ELAP Cert No 12 10) for chemical analysis of total petroleum hydrocarbons as <br /> gasoline (TPHg) utilizing EPA method 8015 modified, benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and <br /> xylenes (BTEX) utilizing EPA method 8020, and oxygenate fuel additives utilizing EPA method <br /> 8260 Groundwater well purge and sample logs are contained in Attachment I <br /> • ANALYTICAL RESULTS <br /> Groundwater samples collected from wells MWi, MW2, and MW3 contained elevated <br /> concentrations of TPHg and BTEX Concentrations of TPHg ranged from 52,200 parts per <br /> billion (ppb) in well MW 1 to 272,000 ppb in well MW2 Concentrations of benzene ranged <br /> from 1,810 ppb in well MW1 to 38,700 ppb in well MW2 Groundwater samples collected from <br /> wells MW1, MW2, and MW3 contained no detectable concentrations of oxygenate fuel <br /> additives The groundwater sample collected from on-site supply well DW contained no <br /> detectable concentrations of TPHg, BTEX, or oxygenate fuel additives Analytical results of <br /> groundwater samples are summarized in Table 2 Laboratory data sheets and chain-of-custody <br /> documentation are contained in Attachment 2 <br /> GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION <br /> Water level measurements were collected from wells MW 1 through MW3 on April 7, 1999 <br /> Water levels ranged from 59 10 to 59 98 feet below the tops of the well casing elevations, <br /> representing an average increase in the water table elevation of approximately 3 33 feet since <br /> November 1998 The water level data were used to develop the groundwater elevation contour <br /> map (Figure 3) Assuming that horizontal isotropic conditions prevail, groundwater in the <br /> uppermost aquifer beneath the site flowed towards the northwest The average hydraulic gradient <br /> on April 7, 1999 was calculated to be 0 005 ft/ft or approximately 26 4 ft/mile A summary of <br /> groundwater monitoring data is presented in Table 1 <br /> w 1I63931quan1y12gr-1999 doc 2 <br />