Laserfiche WebLink
� A v Z <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> for seasonal water level fluctuations The screen slot size is 0 020-inch Well construction details <br /> are depicted on the well logs contained in Appendix A <br />' 22.44 Monitoring Well Development <br /> Groundwater monitoring wells MW 1, MW2, and MW3 were developed on November 16, 1998 <br /> Each well was purged until the extracted water was relatively sediment free Development/purge <br /> logs are included in Appendix C Purgewater was temporarily stored on site in 55-gallon drums <br />' After fluid levels had been allowed to stabilize, groundwater levels were obtained from wells <br /> MW 1, MW2, and MW3 Fluid levels were taken on November 16, 1998, utilizing an electronic <br /> water probe capable of measuring with an accuracy of 1/100 of a foot Groundwater elevation <br /> data are presented in Table 2 <br />' 225 Groundwater Sampling-and Analysis <br /> On November 16, 1998, groundwater samples were collected from wells MW1, MW2, and MW3 <br />' The samples were collected after purging a minimum of three well volumes and stabilization of <br /> electric conductivity, pH, and temperature Field development/purge logs are presented in <br /> Appendix C Subsequent to purging, groundwater was sampled and transferred to appropriate <br /> sample containers, using clean, disposable bailers with bottom emptying devices to reduce <br /> volatilization Sample containers were then labeled with sample identification, placed on ice, and <br /> shipped under chain-of-custody to BC Laboratories <br /> The groundwater samples from wells MW1, MW2, and MW3 were analyzed by BC Laboratories <br /> for TPHg, BTEX, and oxygenate fuel additives A groundwater sample was collected from an <br /> on-site groundwater supply well (DW) The sample from well DW was analyzed for volatile <br /> organics by EPA Method 524 2 Groundwater analytical results are summarized in Table 3, and <br /> laboratory data sheets are presented in Appendix D <br /> 3.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS <br />' 3_1 Geology <br /> Pea gravel fill material was encountered in soil boring MW 1 in the upper 7 feet of the soil column <br />' Soil from depths between 7 feet bgs and 41 to 45 feet bgs consisted of lean clay and clayey sand <br /> Soil from depths between 41 to 45 feet bgs and 46 5 to 50 feet bgs consisted of sandy elastic silt <br /> Soil from depths between 46 5 to 50 feet bgs and 61 5 to 65 feet bgs consisted of poorly graded <br /> sand and poorly graded sand with silt Soil from depths between 61 5 to 65 feet bgs and 66 5 to <br /> 70 feet bgs consisted of lean clay Soil from depths between 66 5 to 70 feet bgs and 70 5 feet bgs <br />' consisted of poorly graded sand Soil from depths between 70 5 feet bgs and 78 5 feet bgs <br /> consisted of lean clay <br /> Silt with sand was encountered in soil boring MW2 in the upper 6 to 10 feet of the soil column <br /> Soil from depths between 6 to 10 feet bgs and 16 feet bgs consisted of lean clay Soil from depths <br /> w\163931rgmr1s\summ doc 3 <br /> i <br />