Laserfiche WebLink
vx a p l�y-1 U <br /> 1� <br /> . 49 w4 <br /> A S S O C I A 7 E S I N C `e <br /> r f�✓ ��r� <br /> hydrocarbons from the soil and then circulates back through the DCC well After a period of <br /> time this rate of transfer from adsorbed to dissolved slows, due to a royrnum reduction A the <br /> residual adsorbed phase mass The dissolved phase mass removal occurs from both increased <br /> biological activity and >n-well air stripping during circulation through the DDC well casing <br />' Ma(d) <br /> The PZla(d) data for dissolved phase TPHg and benzene (Figure 12) shows initially decreasing <br /> concentrations followed by increasing concentrations This trend indicates transport and <br /> breakthrough of higher dissolved phase concentrations following approximately one month of <br /> pilot system operation It is likely that these higher concentrations were transported into the <br /> PZ1a(d) area through the circulation caused by ASI operation <br /> PZl b(d) <br /> The PZlb(d) data for dissolved phase TPHg and benzene (Figure 13) did not seem to increase or <br />' decrease by a significant amount during the air sparge pilot test Because the monitoring point 1s <br /> located a greater distance from ASI, the 30 day pilot test operational period was probably not <br /> long enough to allow for concentration reductions in the dissolved phase ATC expects the <br /> dissolved phase concentrations of TPHg and benzene to decline over the next few months if <br /> operation of the system continued <br /> General <br /> i Overall, the data for dissolved phase TPHg and benzene versus time indicate positive influences <br /> associated with DDC application at the site The data indicate circulation was occurring <br /> throughout the expected treatment zones, and the mass transfer from adsorbed phase to dissolved <br /> phase was taking place Different areas exhibited variation in data trends, however, without <br /> detailed adsorbed phase data from both the initial and ending periods of the pilot test, additional <br /> claims of the pilot system's success cannot be made <br />' 6.5 Air S ar c Pilot Test Results—Petroleum Hydrocarbon Mass Removal <br />' ATC used the well head air emission data to evaluate mass removal rates resulting from in-well <br /> air stripping As an initial step in the process, in-well stripping efficiency was calculated using <br /> influent, AS 1(d), and effluent, AS 1(s), dissolved phase petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations <br /> This calculation was made by dividing the effluent concentration from AS 1(s) by the influent <br /> concentration from AS I(d) and subtracting this ratio from 1 <br />' The average influent concentration of TPHg detected in AS 1(d) while the pilot test was in <br /> operation is shown below <br /> w U63931reportslnfs doc 14 <br /> 1 <br />