My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006286
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
1240
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545598
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0006286
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2020 4:12:19 PM
Creation date
3/23/2020 4:06:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0006286
RECORD_ID
PR0545598
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0001304
FACILITY_NAME
STOCKTON SCAVENGERS ASSOCIATION
STREET_NUMBER
1240
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95206
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1240 NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
136
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. vapor monitoring and on-site analyses to evaluate the limits of excavation <br />' When on-site evaluations indicate that all soil above regulatory limits has <br /> been removed, confirmation samples should be taken and analyzed in a <br /> State of California certified laboratory If laboratory analyses confirm the <br /> field observations, the excavations should be backfilled <br /> The full extent of hydrocarbon impacts to groundwater has yet to be <br /> evaluated The observation of hydrocarbons in the groundwater samples <br /> taken directly from the borings during the recent sampling indicate that <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons are present However, this may be the result of <br /> groundwater coming in contact with hyrocarbon impacted soils during the <br /> boring operations As a result, prior to instituting groundwater <br /> remediation, further investigations should be conducted This should <br /> I include installation of three new monitoring wells which are completed in <br /> the true water bearing zone, but which are double cased down through the <br /> zones of already observed hydrocarbon impacts to the soil In this way, <br /> the in-situ condition of the groundwater can be assessed more accurately <br /> It is possible that with an upward vertical gradient, the groundwater below <br /> 30 feet may not be impacted, thus limiting or even eliminating the need <br /> for groundwater remediation <br /> 2 3 Alternatives for Soil RemediationlDisposal <br /> lieIn selecting an approach to remediating and/or disposing petroleum <br /> impacted soil, it is important to evaluate more than first cost In addition <br />' to cost, MARK recommends that a client consider <br /> ■ Effectiveness in achieving cleanup goals, <br /> s Eliminating or limiting long term liability for materials disposed off-site, <br /> ■ Regulatory agency and community acceptance, and <br /> n Time to achieve cleanup goals <br /> Soil analysis data provided by Mark Zygutis of Norcal Waste Systems <br /> indicated that currently stockpile soil contains up to 1,000 mg/kg of <br /> gasoline and up to 3,000 mg/kg of diesel constituents Soil with <br /> hydrocarbons in this range (above 100 mg/kg) typically require disposal at <br /> a Class I landfill In addition, soil with hydrocarbon concentrations above <br />' 1,000 mg/kg must be treated as a hazardous waste, requiring rigorous <br /> analysis and manifest preparation prior to transportation <br />' To provide a comparison of remedial approaches, we have evaluated three <br /> alternatives <br />' ■ Transportation and off-site treatment and disposal, <br /> ■ On-site bioremediation treatment and off-site disposal, <br /> 2-3 <br /> COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL TRADE SECRET AND PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF TFiE MARK GROUP "Ira <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.